The rising discussion which seems to be absent even in Chattanooga about the climate change hoax, is gaining ground. The state controlled media has not even mentioned the emails from the scientist which created this hoax. The also ignored issues such as Rev. Wright, Bill Ayres, 90 days to decide on troop levels, and the fact that a terror attack was perpetrated at Fort Hood.
This is the largest hoax in the history of science. The emails which were revealed, described how that the original data, from which these men of science had formulated their theories, were destroyed. They claimed, they needed the space. The also discussed that the information and errors could not be revealed to the world. The world has been suckered. Anything that causes the redistribution of wealth should always be viewed with a critical eye.
After the initial claims were made by the men of science that the world was entering another ice age, the world listened. Then, the MOS said no, the world is getting hotter, and the world listened. The climate change hoax, created the opportunity for governments and others to profit greatly. Fees, penalties, and cleanup charges began to amount. Then, the ultimate fee, cap and tax as well as carbon credits have surfaced. Just ask Al Gore.
Even our current President has side stepped the issue of the revealing of the MOS emails. He is going to Copenhagen next month, to placate the world and continue this hoax. He will agree and continue his leveling of the playing field for the world. The United States, as a leader, is going to be brought down, not raising others with this hoax. If this information had surfaced on President George W. Bush's watch, the news cycle would be covered, 24 hours, on the state controlled media. Congress, would have called for investigations. Textbooks are going to have to be re-written. This changes everything.
Why do you suppose that the U.N. would swallow all this? Power and control.
The Pursuit of Happiness:
Howard Hayden and other scientists have also reported that big money is behind pushing the global warming propaganda. The cause of the recent global cooling? The sun was reported to have little to no sun spot activity in the past few months. It has been the most spotless year since 1954. The sun is the cause of warming and cooling trends.
Top environmental scientists are also reporting that the solar system as a whole warmed during this recent warming trend.
Most recently the government has been found lying and making up data, now being spun as mistakes, about this year’s global temperatures to make it seem like a warmer year rather than the colder year it has been.
My granddaughter from SMMHS and I discussed the above. She was shocked. All these years she has been taught that the climate change hoax was real and the polar bears were all drowning. Well, she is now informed and hates being lied to. Maybe we should all ask for refunds on our EPB bills and other utilities on taxes, surcharges, and fund for "green" power. Also, read more in the Wall Street Journal.
Mitch Thurmer
Signal Mountain mthurmer4300@comcast.net
* * *
The sad thing is this isn't the first time we have been hoaxed. Remember R-12 freon that cost 99 cents a pound and kept our cars cooled down in the summer? Ozone depletion was the danger then, except now we know the sun builds ozone seasonally. The truth is DuPont's patent expired and R-12 was shipping in from Mexico at 50 cents a pound, so what did they do? They lobbied congress and paid for studies that showed a relation between R-12 and the ozone hole, and they patented R-132 as a replacement.
I have even heard Al Gore had ownership in companies that made parts to retrofit and convert older vehicles with the new freon. He is getting good at making cash on phony science, and I hope he is prosecuted for the fraud.
As the founder of the Weather Channel said last year, and he is a real climate scientist, Global Warming is the biggest fraud ever forced on the American people, and a few years down the road and a few hundred billion dollars later everyone will know it. Unfortunately, we don't have the money to spend on it now; we have spent it on too many other lies from the politicians.
Keith Roberts
* * *
First off let me say that I believe that the global warming is a large moral panic. If one remembers the first earth day, the front page of the New York Times declared an urgent warning of global cooling that did not happen. How about the warning of the dangers of el nino in the 1980s or the spray deodorant causing ozone holes. All these “science fads” have all come and gone and been discredited or attributed to natural cycles.
Climategate is merely a symptom of the “celebrity gotta have a cause” syndrome, “scientist gotta have a paycheck credentials from a major liberal university syndrome” and “liberal gotta save correct the world” syndrome. While the resistance is big business and “conservatism’s gotta protect the free market” syndrome.
Scientific data tells us global temperature peaked in 1998, hardly sustained global warming.
Activists tell us we are going under the most rapid period of warming in 100,000 years; science tells us this is true. But look at the past 125,000 year record, and since we are looking at tens of thousand of years of records it not a great leap to go an extra 25,000, and - surprise - temperatures warming fluctuate even more rapidly and drastically.
Beside the global warming fad, is this current green movement necessarily a “bad thing”? I say no.
Why should we pump millions of CO2 into our atmosphere? Is trying to limit this a bad thing? Certainly doing that is good for the environment, though we are a drop in the bucket compared to natural causes of CO2.
Is building buildings LEED Certified bad? No, but with the Majestic downtown, I believe it missing the point. I left there days ago and there was still a mound of garbage overflowing from the dumpster. When trash rots it produces methane far more damaging to the atmosphere than vehicles combined.
Is trying to encourage sustainable farming and free range animals bad? No, Green-Life produces jobs directly for people employed there, not to mention farm owners and farmhands from surrounding areas. Personally free range chicken eggs are far superior than the anemic yellow Bi-lo eggs my friends buy. However it is unrealistic to have every product sold in the U.S to be organically grown; I have heard every median on every street would have to be utilized to grow that much.
Is cutting our dependance on oil bad?
Maybe for oil companies like BP who already smell the winds of change and are diversifying their products and not putting their eggs in one basket.
It is beyond me how the conservative christian base of the republican party cannot support the green movement? As it says in Leviticus 18:28 “And if you defile the land, it will vomit you out as it vomited out the nations that were before you.” God clearly warns that defile the land will cause Israel to leave its promised land. I cannot help but think that it is God’s will that we preserve the earth and not defile it. Liberals and rightwing christians should stand united with the “godless liberals” in the green movement.
Bryan Barkley
UTC Sophmore Studying Political Science And Anthropology
* * *
Mr. Barkley,
The reason your friends buy eggs and other foods at the Walmart is
because they cost about 1/2 as much as they do at Green-Life. The
reason the climate-change, global warming hoax (if it indeed exists)
is bad is because it will unnecessarily drive up the costs of goods and services. Cap-n-Trade, though seemingly may have good intentions, will drive small businesses out due to production costs. And where large companies can absorb those production costs, who do you think will end up paying the difference? The consumer. The majority of citizens can't afford to go and buy trendy, organic foods. However, if the climate-change, global warming hoax continues to spiral out of control, those same people won't be able to afford the Walmart brands either.
Nathan A. Jones