Speed Cameras On Barton Avenue - And Response (6)

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Recently more speed cameras where added in Chattanooga. The newest are on Barton Ave, about a block from my home. I personally feel this is poor public policy on several fronts.

Firstly, as many of us know the lights are maintained by a contractor who receives revenues from tickets. I would say this is at best a clear conflict of interest.

Secondly, the continual video surveillance of these cameras whether or not anyone is actually breaking a traffic law is in my view a clear privacy concern.

Thirdly, from a legal standpoint the citation issued by a camera for speeding is different then one issued by an officer. Several states, including Arizona most recently, have had their cameras challenged on 14th Amendment grounds. To summarize, having two different punishments for the same infraction goes against our most basic rights at the federal and constitutional level.

And finally, the blanket enforcement by these cameras seems heavy handed. Whoever is driving my car, I am responsible for the speeding ticket. Is this really the type of enforcement we as a society are comfortable with?

I raised these issues recently to my District 1 representative, Linda Bennett, and she very promptly forwarded my concerns to John VanWinkle, City Traffic Engineer. He stated that these cameras are only for safety, controlled by the city, and legal. Ms Bennett herself stated that she supports the cameras.

Therefore, it seems that unless we wish to have these cameras continue to be installed and operated, we must voice our concerns and vote accordingly. I urge my fellow residents to call their representatives and voice their concerns over these cameras and to clearly and politely state their opposition to them. I personally will continue to voice my opposition and vote against those in public office who support these mechanisms.

Bob Shearer
Chattanooga

* * *

While I am not in a position to argue the constitutionality of speed cameras I do have a problem with the specific camera on Barton Avenue. When driving at night the light from the camera shines directly into the driver's eyes and is a major distraction.

I believe that the supporters of these cameras argue based on safety and decreasing accident rates and it seems that they are bolstered by statistics. The lights on these speed cameras will have the opposite effect. They will likely cause accidents by distracting the drivers.

I urge Mr. VanWinkle to look into an alternative to this distraction.

Kirk Brody, MD
Chattanooga

* * *

If you think that these cameras are for safety I have a stimulus package I'd like to sell you.

Robert Harvey
Chattanooga

* * *

I will not use Barton Avenue. Tell the merchants in this area, they have lost the taxpayer’s business.

I haven't been in Red Bank since their traffic cameras were installed. This is just another tax, Chat(tax)nooga at its best, tax and spend.

Traffic cameras are about revenue, not safety.

Chuck Davis
CheesyII@aol.com

* * *

I personally like the cameras. It's almost impossible to obey the speed limit anywhere in Chattanooga. Try driving on the interstate between Missionary Ridge toward town or toward Hamilton Place. You will get run over if you go anywhere near the legal speed of 55 mph.

I live on Missionary Ridge and drive the Crest Road every day. The speed limit is 30. You used to fear for your life when you came around a curve. They posted a camera on a stretch a month or two ago and the difference is wonderful.

Why are all my "God fearin' law abiding" brothers and sisters so opposed to obeying the speed limit laws?

Greg Smith

* * *

Take your opinions to the voting booth, especially those in support of traffic cameras. I am one who has paid a $50 fine to Red Bank and never went back.

If everybody did the same thing it would definitely be safer in Red Bank or anywhere the put traffic cameras.

Richard Sledge

* * *

I was driving home one evening recently and as I came up the hill on Barton Avenue that camera's light momentarily blinded me. I was completely confused.

I think that camera is dangerous and unnecessary. I will certainly not support any council person or official who is endorsing these cameras.

I wonder how liable the city is if a driver loses control of their car and has a wreck when that camera blinds them.

Alison Falinski
North Chattanooga


Always Read The Fine Print - And Response (3)

So, Chief Dodd retired before 25 years of service and is angry that he's being charged a five percent fee for surviving spouse benefits, even though that change was enacted prior to his retiring? Well, welcome to the real world, Mr. Dodd. Always read the fine print. City employees were also once able to carry their health insurance with them if they retired earlier than 25 years, ... (click for more)

Despite SROs, Walled Compounds Bring Violent Intruders On Themselves

People in live in terror of a school massacre, near enough to plan for yet far enough away that no one need act in panic or haste. Barely do paramilitary drills such as that  Monday  in Monteagle ease their fears.  An “active shooter drill,” as David Carroll reports it, quietly rolled along among three police agencies at Monteagle Elementary School, with ... (click for more)

County Schools Have Plan To Put Security Cameras At Every School

The Hamilton County Schools have a plan to put security cameras in every school, Supt. Rick Smith told the County School Board Thursday night. He said the money would come from the $2,201,000 the schools received last year from the sale of the old Ooltewah Elementary School property. The proposal must get approval from the School Board at the December meeting, then from the ... (click for more)

Lookout Mountain, Ga., Raises Sewer Rates; Joins In Kudzu Fight

The Lookout Mountain, Ga., City Council on Thursday night approved an increase in sewer charges. The council approved ordinance 281 increasing sewer rates to $6 per 100 cubic feet of water from the previous rate of $4.77.  The new increase will be in effect in January 2015.    City Manager Brad Haven said the town will be replacing the flow meter for ... (click for more)

Notre Dame Cruises To Another Playoff Victory, 48-7

The Notre Dame football express continues to roll on down the track and it appears the Fighting Irish are just picking up a little bit more steam. Facing a 10-2 McMinn Central in the quarterfinal round of the TSSAA Class 3-A football playoffs at spacious Finley Stadium, Notre Dame did what they've been doing all year -- scoring early and often while limiting the other team to ... (click for more)

Irish QB Darras Dazzles Chargers With Passing Show

Film sessions all week didn’t do McMinn Central much good in Friday’s TSSAA Class 3A quarterfinal playoff game against hard-charging Notre Dame. “We knew they were a good ball team from what we saw on film,” Chargers coach Josh Goodin said. “But the films didn’t do them justice. We couldn’t matchup with them.” It was obvious from the start. The third-ranked Irish ... (click for more)