Vote No To City Charter Recall Amendment On Ballot

Saturday, November 03, 2012

Our government watch group simply marvels at the nonsense set forth by our City Council to amend the recall provisions of the city charter. Why? The recall provision is currently in the city charter because an appointed committee from the Mayor’s office drafted the current recall provision. Then, the city council approved the recall provision, and voter’s approved the recall provision by referendum on a ballot. The current recall provision exists due to direct action of City Council.

The last recall against the mayor was not the first, there was another effort, and never a day, did the City Council question the recall provisions of the charter. Why? They knew the early recall organization was not large enough to get the signatures, so they just ignored and left the recall law in place, with no action. If it was bad or flawed law then, why didn’t the City Council act to repair years ago?

By formal vote of the City Council, the current recall provision was placed in the charter. Yet now, the same elected body deems the recall ‘flawed.” Understand, the current recall provision is only being declared flawed, bad law, because citizens exercised their rights to use the recall provision. Their mindset seems to convey that it is perfectly acceptable to have accountability measures, as long as no one uses the measure. The City Council actions speak volumes to this fact.

The city charter recall provisions are less stringent than the state recall provisions, because that is what the city council and voters wanted, a strong measure of accountability for elected officials.

Interestingly enough, the City’s recall provisions were not deemed “flawed” until citizens were successful in acquiring an adequate number of signatures. At the end of the court battle, the Appeals Court correctly ruled that the city charter was the governing recall documents. The lower courts were wrong, the state law was not applicable, the city charter was. The recall failed on technicality on dating each signature, rather than the entire page.

In any petition measure, without a doubt, 20 to 40 percent of signatures collected are lost to voters address from moving, district issues. The pages were dated, but not each line. I have worked other petitions for a ballot, and these problem are common. However, anyway you dice it, 10,8000 voters wanted a recall election and the Election Commission confirmed the signatures. The people spoke.

It is also an undisputable fact that more registered voters, signed the recall petition, than votes to reelect Mayor Littlefield in 2009.

In the 2009 mayoral election, the Hamilton County Election Commission archives report that 17,913 Chattanooga citizens voted in the 2009 reelection of Mayor Littlefield. Of the total 17,913 votes in 2009, 57 percent or 10,234 voted in favor of the reelection of Mayor Littlefield. Again, it is undisputed that over 10,800 registered voters signed the recall petition. The number of recall signatures represents 106 percent of the total number of votes for Mayor Ron Littlefield to be re-elected in March 2009, and 60 percent of the total voter cards cast.

In the 2005 runoff election, the Hamilton County Election Commission achieves report that 28,140 Chattanooga citizens voted in the 2005 runoff election of Mayor Littlefield. Of the total 28,140 votes in 2005, 54.11 percent or 15,224 voted in favor of Mayor Littlefield. Again it is undisputed that over 10,800 registered voters signed the recall petition. The number of recall signatures represents 71 percent of the total number of votes for Mayor Littlefield to be elected in 2005, and almost 40 percent of the total voter cards cast.

The City Council now wishes to remove the recall provisions that citizens voted by referendum and approved to be in the city charter.

The charter provision for recall is only flawed law if citizens use it, right?

Vote No to the charter amendment for recall that appears on the current ballot.

April Eidson, Spokesperson

Little Chicago Watch


Why Sabrena Turner Is The Better Candidate - And Response

Chess is a complicated game which requires the player to make the best move from a sometimes large number of seemingly good choices. Each possible choice must be examined thoroughly and discarded until the best move is determined. Hopefully, the voters throughout Hamilton County will, as I did, use a similar process regarding their choice for the Hamilton County Commission District ... (click for more)

Charter Gives Little Solace If Chattanooga Sued Over Gay Ordinance

Today opponents of Chattanooga's domestic partner benefits ordinance are launching their campaign to convince city voters to overturn the rule in an August plebiscite. Residents seeking to give council member Chris Anderson the boot are rallying this week for signatures to put his ouster on the ballot. They have less than two weeks to obtain 1,600 signatures.   But there's ... (click for more)

City Applies For $27 Million Federal Grant On $52 Million Wilcox Tunnel Project

The city is applying for a $27 million federal TIGER 6 grant for a $52 million complete reworking of the narrow Wilcox Tunnel through Missionary Ridge. The project would leave the current tunnel in place for westbound traffic with a single lane and build a new two-lane tunnel for eastbound traffic. There would be an emergency egress cross passage between the two. Final ... (click for more)

NAACP Recommends Staying Away From Planned Protest By Neo-Nazi Group

The president of the Chattanooga Chapter of the NAACP, urged local residents to stay away from a planned rally here by the Nationalist Socialist Movement in August. James R. Mapp said the group seeks to provoke incidents and said counter-protests could lead to problems. Mr. Mapp said, "On April 8th, 2014, reports surfaced throughout the Chattanooga-Hamilton County region that ... (click for more)

Owls' Fugate Fires Two-Hit Shutout In 2-0 Win Over Blue Raiders

Ooltewah was on the verge of a District 5-AAA double-header sweep against Cleveland. But the Blue Raiders’ hot-hitting catcher Hunter Oliver had other ideas. The Owls rode Logan Fugate’s brilliant two-hit shutout and two first-inning runs to a 2-0 win over Cleveland in the first game at A.C. Bud Ball Field on Wednesday. “Logan is an absolute warrior,” Owls coach Brian Hitchcox ... (click for more)

Bucs' Willingham Strikes Out School-Record 17 In 5-A Win

Boyd-Buchanan’s Brandon Willingham threw a three-hit, complete-game gem and set a school record with 17 strikeouts in the Bucs’ 7-1 victory over Copper Basin on Wednesday. Willingham, a sophomore, improved his record to 6-0 on the season while the Bucs went to 14-9 overall and 5-0 in District 5-A. Willingham threw 101 pitches with 73 strikes in dominating the Cougars. Willingham ... (click for more)