An ancient Italian philosopher, Niccolo Machiavelli, once said wisely, “The wise man does at once what the fool does finally, so you can expect Gerald McCormick and the other state legislators from our area to introduce a bill today that will change the governance structure of Chattanooga’s Erlanger Hospital. And, almost as quickly, you can look for the current board of trustees at the hospital to go forward with a called meeting and name a new chief operating officer after a well-paced year-long search.
Understand, the legislators have asked twice that the current board slow its effort to bring desperately-needed leadership to our Level 1 trauma complex and, yes, there has been a collective gasp from hospital leaders since Thursday afternoon when the legislators unveiled a somewhat puzzling solution of what the new arrangement might be.
Sadly, there has been woefully little discussion between the two groups when, in fact, each is eager for the same outcome.
Over the weekend there has been a flurry of calls and meetings between members of the board and the legislators and, with key meetings now scheduled for this week, a sense of urgency by both entities has been established. Erlanger’s need for solid leadership can’t wait any longer and, while there is still time for certain amendments to be made to the proposed bill, everybody agrees that radical changes in how the city’s largest hospital will be operated are long overdue.
The CEO search, activated early last year in the wake of Jim Brexler’s departure, has gone well and three finalists have been vetted and interviewed. The board could take a vote right now and quickly allow a new CEO to take the reins of the 4,000-employee institution. To wait accomplishes nothing and the hire would effectively be among the last duties of the 12-person board that will be replaced under new guidelines.
Obviously there would be some members of the current board who would be asked to serve on the new one - their knowledge and experience far superior to someone who is unfamiliar with the complex situation at Erlanger. The current plan suggested by the legislators calls for seven voting members and two non-voting members but already that has been roundly recognized as folly.
There was also the notion a medical doctor should not be included when, in fact, the four MDs who now serve as trustees know more about the demands and needs of the hospital on a day-to-day basis than the lay professionals who have served in the past. Nowhere in the proposed bill does it say an MD cannot be selected as a voting member and there is the belief a member of the nursing staff or another non-medical employee might be beneficial on the board as well.
Where top-notch lay professionals lend strength is on the business end of the $800 million enterprise, and certain people like vice chairman Donny Hutcherson and Jennifer Stanley have made brilliant contributions. There are others who have served admirably but also some who should clearly not be considered and now have an honorable escape route.
While the new governance plan is still sketchy, it is believed the legislators will meet with County Mayor Jim Coppinger once the bill is finalized and an initial board will be chosen, having different members serving for three-, two- and one-year terms. Members can serve up to three terms but as they rotate off – or other vacancies come available – the new board will fill the vacancies rather than politicians or special-interest groups.
Again, the most aching need is to get the proper leadership inside the hospital. A new CEO will have to hire a staff, replace some crucial mid-level positions that have soured, and begin a sweeping overhaul that will erase the $2.5 million lost by Erlanger in the first fiscal half of this year.
Capital improvements have been overlooked, the information technology system is terribly inadequate, employee morale has taken a terrible beating … the list goes on and on. The need for a new CEO is imperative and the current trustees believe that if it takes another year to go through the same search process again, the result would be disastrous to the hospital after losing $10 million in the last fiscal year.
One thing is certain – both the legislators and the hospital trustees must move quickly in an effort to reverse the deteriorating condition of our area’s top health provider. As football’s George Allen once said, “The future is now.”