Rep. DesJarlais: Granting Illegal Immigrants Amnesty Will Increase Costs For Hardworking Tennesseans - And Response

  • Tuesday, October 29, 2013
  • Rep. Scott DesJarlais

The non-partisan Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates the illegal immigration population of Tennessee at 120,000.  Clearly something must be done. But the Senate immigration reform bill, drafted behind closed doors by the “Gang of Eight,” and championed by President Obama only compounds the problem. In its current state, it provides amnesty for the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants.   

Before we add to the mess of immigration laws, we need to stop turning a blind eye when current laws are violated right in front of us.

In fact, our own local law enforcement officials have been explicitly denied the ability to enforce standing laws. When Sheriff Jimmy Jones of Knox County attempted to do the job he was elected to do by requesting his officers be provided with the training necessary to enforce federal immigration laws when applicable, he was denied.  The Obama Administration has been doing the same to other law enforcement officials across the country.

The Senate Immigration actually increases our illegal immigration problem by sending a signal that anyone who comes to our country illegally will eventually be allowed to stay. This acts as a disincentives legal immigration, which is the exact opposite of what the government should be aiming for. Further, while we should welcome with open arms those who come to this country respecting its laws and traditions, encouraging illegal immigration makes it harder for all citizens to compete in the labor market, driving down wages, and growing the tax burden. 

The illegal immigrant population in Tennessee comes at a huge cost to taxpayers. The average Tennessee household pays $212 a year supporting the illegal population, according to data from FAIR. Had this money remained in the pockets taxpayers, it would have covered the equivalent of almost two average Tennessee household’s monthly electric bills. These potential savings are nothing to scoff at when many are still struggling and living paycheck to paycheck. 

Granting illegal immigrants a path to citizenship will exacerbate these costs. Some argue to the contrary, suggesting that the addition of millions to the tax base would offset any benefits they incur, but this is not true when the typical incomes of illegal immigrants are accounted for. According to the Center for Immigration Studies, 94 percent of this population lives at or near the poverty level. This means that they would be net receivers of entitlements and, since they would also be eligible for more government benefits, the cost to taxpayers would likely surpass the current $212 a year.

Rather than a one size fits all approach to immigration – like we saw with healthcare – Congress and the president should pursue individual, targeted measures that receive broad bipartisan support. For example, Tennessee’s strong agricultural industry relies on a legal, viable guest worker program. Unfortunately, our nation’s current guest worker program is outdated and in need of substantial restructuring. We can and must establish an effective and workable temporary visa program. 

President Obama has called for reform under the guise of making the system ‘fair,’ but what is fair about a bill that allows current laws to be ignored and takes more hard-earned taxpayer money? 

We need a sensible approach to immigration, one that prioritizes keeping our borders safe and allows for enforcement of current laws. 

* * * 

Illegals are consumers, and according to Ronald Reagan consumers are what drives our economy.  People who are for free markets should also be for open borders, or they are walking contradictions.  If so we live in a consumer driven economy, then how are illegals hurting us by doing jobs Americans will not do?  How are they hurting us by spending their money (and paying sales tax to the State of Tennessee because they spend most of their money here) at Walmart? 

Why is it the Hispanics are always a threat, and not the illegal Israelis, or the illegal Saudis?  A sign in Juarez, Mexico in 1987 read, "we are all webacks," and this is a fact.  The name Desjarlais is not a Native American name, and neither is the name Durham.  What did your family come to the United States for, Congressman?  To work?  To live free?  To obtain opportunity?  To enjoy the benefits of stolen Indian land?  

How many illegals were used to build Grandview Medical Center (I'm asking because I know the answer) of which you were the chief of staff at one time?  

All of this is double talk, and hopefully the American people will wake up to the superstition and dogma spread by the Tea Party bunch.  The real answer here is to divide Mexico up into three smaller states, and admit them into the Union.  I dare say this idea would pass a national referendum in Mexico.   

Steven Durham
 


Opinion
A Disgrace
  • 4/17/2024

Republicans followed the Constitution, accepting articles for trials submitted by Democrats for two impeachments of Donald Trump. That can’t be said in the impeachment of a man who took an ... more

There Should Be No Threats Against VW Workers
  • 4/17/2024

The essential right of Volkswagen Chattanooga employees to freely engage in collective bargaining must be free of threats, intimidation, harassment and coercion in all its ugliest forms. We stand ... more

Ready To Restore The Field In Red Bank
  • 4/17/2024

On behalf of Trust For Public Land and our many community partners, I want to express our sincere gratitude to Mayor Barry and the city of Red Bank for their commitment to the stewardship of ... more