How To Correct An Erroneous Vote - And Response (3)

Tuesday, December 3, 2013

We have to give the five who voted for the generous benefits package for live-in partners the benefit of a doubt.  They could have misread the sentiment of their constituents whom they never consulted before they asked for their vote.  Or perhaps the catch phrase "fairness" just blotted out any deliberation of "right" or "fairness" to the tax payers who would be struggling in the future to pay for the gratification of the alternate whims of the potential recipients.  Perhaps the concept was thrown on them before they had an opportunity to consider its ramifications.  

Now they have an opportunity to rectify their hasty decision and instead of being branded as betraying the trust of those who cast their votes for them, they have been granted an opportunity to gain their respect.  The voters are very forgiving when a politician is willing to say, "I made a mistake."

The overwhelming number of city voters who signed petitions objecting to the practice, and the broad base of the community those votes came from clearly show the opposition to this move.  The Commission now has the opportunity to rescind their vote saying the voters have clearly spoken, or they can allow it to be put to a referendum of the people.  In effect these petitions already reflect the sentiment of the people with willing citizens shouldering the expense of the ballot instead of the taxpayers.   

Chattanooga has the opportunity to correct the downward spiral of our society, and the eyes of other cities and states who hastily made this mistake are fixed upon us looking for one deliberative body to stand up and say, "we made a mistake."

Bobby Wood

Harrison 

* * * 

Mr. Wood made a very striking statement when he offered that voters are very forgiving when a politician is willing to say, "I made a mistake."  In contrast, I believe that the members of the City Council who supported the domestic partner ordinance will find out during the next election just how unforgiving voters who remember this fiasco will remain.  For some, and possibly all, it could be their first and only term in office. 

I find it disheartening that Mr. Wood believes we should give them the "benefit of the doubt."  If the City Council was ill-informed, inappropriately advised, nor did they represent the views of their constituencies...tough.  It is their job, for which we pay, to be well-informed about matters brought before the Council.   

I spoke with a lady last night who advised that when she discussed the situation with Carol Berz and offered her dismay of Mrs. Berz's support, she was told by Mrs. Berz, summarily, that "she was sorry the constituent didn't agree with her, but that she had peace with her decision."  I find it very chameleon-like of Mrs. Berz to say that and then turn around and congratulate the group who worked so hard against her at the Council meeting.  

It appears to me that we have allegedly gone from the "good ole boy" type of City Council to an alleged, at least in part, City Council of members with demi-god complexes.  Once again, we elected you to represent our standards.  We pay your salary.  You work for us.  We, as the city of Chattanooga citizens, do not just sit back and "baa" like sheep right off the edge of a cliff, if the shepherd leads them so. 

Will the City Council rescind and/or repeal this highly debated and very heated ordinance, or will they let it go to a general vote in August 2014?  As for my own personal opinion, I do not think they will repeal due to the five supporter's pride being bruised.  I could be wrong?  I hope so.  If the City Council forces the issue to an election referendum, I suggest we require them to pay for it.  After all, there are consequences to one's actions.

I would also like to know why this ordinance was being offered to the city of Chattanooga employees only?  What about the county employees?  What about the state employees?  What about employees in general?  Perhaps the city attorney can shed additional insight into this alleged discrimination of other workers?  In addition, I will be making contact with the state attorney general's office to see how a city ordinance or referendum can supercede a state-defined law that recognizes marriage as between one man and one woman.  I don't care with whom someone makes a life.  What I do care about is maintaining and obeying laws already defined by the state of Tennessee.  If you want to be tenacious about this issue, take it the state level where something might actually get changed. 

Please do not think that I am bashing a member of any group based upon their sex, age, race, etc.  I am not.  In fact, I am trying to bring fairness to all.  If you are going to offer certain benefits to one group of people, that same benefits package should apply to all employees.  To do otherwise, the first word that comes to mind is discrimination. 

Rusty Munger 

* * * 

Wait a minute.  For weeks we've been hearing how the people of Chattanooga need to be allowed to vote on this referendum, and now the petitioners are saying that they don't really want it to go to a vote?  Sounds like some people are not so confident about the outcome as they pretend. 

I can assure you that the turnout supporting the original anti-discrimination ordinance will be huge, much greater than the paltry number of people who signed the petition against it.  There are a lot more citizens of Chattanooga who believe in equal rights than there are religious bigots who oppose them. 

Bring on the election. The citizens of our progressive city welcome it.  For once, we can put an end to the tantrums thrown by the spoiled little children who didn't get their way.  Those on the City Council who voted against the ordinance will now realize that they aren't truly representing the will of the people.  Perhaps we should petition for their recall. 

Bret Douglas
Chattanooga 

* * * 

Rusty Munger,

Some seem to think that the Council's rescinding or repealing of their vote on the Domestic Partners Benefits Ordinance would settle the issue and make a referendum unnecessary.  I think this is an error. 

My understanding is that the Council has the right to repeal their previous 5 to 4 vote in light of the petition and in effect say that they bow to the will of the people.  However, the issue will only be resolved legally by a referendum next August when the voters of Chattanooga will have occasion to speak officially on this issue.  

Given the number of signatures that appeared on the petition (over 10,000), it seems clear that the matter will be determined by the will of the people, as it should be.  Sadly, the five out-of-touch Council members who apparently acted outside the consensus opinion on this issue may have to answer later for their incorrect, partisan view.  Decisions have their consequences. 

James West
Ringgold


Roy Exum: Look At My April Garden

On this April Fool’s Day, as I take my monthly stroll through my virtual garden, there are gorgeous flowers and there are weeds, which appear to be trying harder than the flowers. So let’s see what we find before searching for “The Prize Egg” on Sunday. A FLOWER to the New York cab driver who told a young writer, “Always remember that everyone you meet knows something that you ... (click for more)

Easter Sunday Is Victory Day For Christians

Easter Sunday is a Christian's day of celebration.  We will not be denied our day of victory for the sake of political correctness.  We may be suppressed and labeled as fanatical and offensive, and we may be denied our freedom to openly express our faith but one thing we cannot be denied; the reality of an empty tomb.     He lives!   While others ... (click for more)

Chattanooga Police Detective Karl Fields Terminated On Code Of Conduct Charges

Karl Fields, former Chattanooga Police detective, was terminated on Wednesday on code of conduct charges. The Chattanooga Police Department said it received a correspondence from the Hamilton County District Attorney’s Office o n Sept. 4, 2014,  informing it of allegations of inappropriate behavior committed by a CPD investigator during the course of a rape investigation. ... (click for more)

Autopsy Says 5-Year-Old Whitwell Boy Died Of Blunt Force Trauma

An autopsy on five-year-old Lucas Dillon of Whitwell says he died of blunt force trauma. The TBI is investigating the death, which is being treated as a homicide. The child, who lived on Jewell Lane Road, was injured on Saturday and died in a hospital on Monday. Lucas was a student at Whitwell Head Start. (click for more)

'Canes Edge Mustangs On Cox's Game-Winner In 7th

  Maybe it was just East Hamilton’s turn to win a tight game. After dropping 5-4 and 2-1 decisions to District 5-AAA rivals Bradley Central and McMinn County, respectively, the Hurricanes weren’t about to lose their third straight one-run decision in league play on Tuesday. So, Kyle Cox and Matt Milita, two of the team’s five seniors, decided to do something about ... (click for more)

Central Scores Early, Hangs On To Beat Red Bank, 7-6

Central baseball coach Glen Carter could finally breathe a sigh of relief. His Purple Pounders had bolted to a 7-0 lead in the first three innings of Monday's 6-AA skirmish with the Red Bank Lions and things were looking pretty good for those guys in purple. But it all came down to Red Bank's final at-bat.  The Lions sent eight hitters to the plate and scored ... (click for more)