How To Correct An Erroneous Vote - And Response (3)

Tuesday, December 03, 2013

We have to give the five who voted for the generous benefits package for live-in partners the benefit of a doubt.  They could have misread the sentiment of their constituents whom they never consulted before they asked for their vote.  Or perhaps the catch phrase "fairness" just blotted out any deliberation of "right" or "fairness" to the tax payers who would be struggling in the future to pay for the gratification of the alternate whims of the potential recipients.  Perhaps the concept was thrown on them before they had an opportunity to consider its ramifications.  

Now they have an opportunity to rectify their hasty decision and instead of being branded as betraying the trust of those who cast their votes for them, they have been granted an opportunity to gain their respect.  The voters are very forgiving when a politician is willing to say, "I made a mistake."

The overwhelming number of city voters who signed petitions objecting to the practice, and the broad base of the community those votes came from clearly show the opposition to this move.  The Commission now has the opportunity to rescind their vote saying the voters have clearly spoken, or they can allow it to be put to a referendum of the people.  In effect these petitions already reflect the sentiment of the people with willing citizens shouldering the expense of the ballot instead of the taxpayers.   

Chattanooga has the opportunity to correct the downward spiral of our society, and the eyes of other cities and states who hastily made this mistake are fixed upon us looking for one deliberative body to stand up and say, "we made a mistake."

Bobby Wood

Harrison 

* * * 

Mr. Wood made a very striking statement when he offered that voters are very forgiving when a politician is willing to say, "I made a mistake."  In contrast, I believe that the members of the City Council who supported the domestic partner ordinance will find out during the next election just how unforgiving voters who remember this fiasco will remain.  For some, and possibly all, it could be their first and only term in office. 

I find it disheartening that Mr. Wood believes we should give them the "benefit of the doubt."  If the City Council was ill-informed, inappropriately advised, nor did they represent the views of their constituencies...tough.  It is their job, for which we pay, to be well-informed about matters brought before the Council.   

I spoke with a lady last night who advised that when she discussed the situation with Carol Berz and offered her dismay of Mrs. Berz's support, she was told by Mrs. Berz, summarily, that "she was sorry the constituent didn't agree with her, but that she had peace with her decision."  I find it very chameleon-like of Mrs. Berz to say that and then turn around and congratulate the group who worked so hard against her at the Council meeting.  

It appears to me that we have allegedly gone from the "good ole boy" type of City Council to an alleged, at least in part, City Council of members with demi-god complexes.  Once again, we elected you to represent our standards.  We pay your salary.  You work for us.  We, as the city of Chattanooga citizens, do not just sit back and "baa" like sheep right off the edge of a cliff, if the shepherd leads them so. 

Will the City Council rescind and/or repeal this highly debated and very heated ordinance, or will they let it go to a general vote in August 2014?  As for my own personal opinion, I do not think they will repeal due to the five supporter's pride being bruised.  I could be wrong?  I hope so.  If the City Council forces the issue to an election referendum, I suggest we require them to pay for it.  After all, there are consequences to one's actions.

I would also like to know why this ordinance was being offered to the city of Chattanooga employees only?  What about the county employees?  What about the state employees?  What about employees in general?  Perhaps the city attorney can shed additional insight into this alleged discrimination of other workers?  In addition, I will be making contact with the state attorney general's office to see how a city ordinance or referendum can supercede a state-defined law that recognizes marriage as between one man and one woman.  I don't care with whom someone makes a life.  What I do care about is maintaining and obeying laws already defined by the state of Tennessee.  If you want to be tenacious about this issue, take it the state level where something might actually get changed. 

Please do not think that I am bashing a member of any group based upon their sex, age, race, etc.  I am not.  In fact, I am trying to bring fairness to all.  If you are going to offer certain benefits to one group of people, that same benefits package should apply to all employees.  To do otherwise, the first word that comes to mind is discrimination. 

Rusty Munger 

* * * 

Wait a minute.  For weeks we've been hearing how the people of Chattanooga need to be allowed to vote on this referendum, and now the petitioners are saying that they don't really want it to go to a vote?  Sounds like some people are not so confident about the outcome as they pretend. 

I can assure you that the turnout supporting the original anti-discrimination ordinance will be huge, much greater than the paltry number of people who signed the petition against it.  There are a lot more citizens of Chattanooga who believe in equal rights than there are religious bigots who oppose them. 

Bring on the election. The citizens of our progressive city welcome it.  For once, we can put an end to the tantrums thrown by the spoiled little children who didn't get their way.  Those on the City Council who voted against the ordinance will now realize that they aren't truly representing the will of the people.  Perhaps we should petition for their recall. 

Bret Douglas
Chattanooga 

* * * 

Rusty Munger,

Some seem to think that the Council's rescinding or repealing of their vote on the Domestic Partners Benefits Ordinance would settle the issue and make a referendum unnecessary.  I think this is an error. 

My understanding is that the Council has the right to repeal their previous 5 to 4 vote in light of the petition and in effect say that they bow to the will of the people.  However, the issue will only be resolved legally by a referendum next August when the voters of Chattanooga will have occasion to speak officially on this issue.  

Given the number of signatures that appeared on the petition (over 10,000), it seems clear that the matter will be determined by the will of the people, as it should be.  Sadly, the five out-of-touch Council members who apparently acted outside the consensus opinion on this issue may have to answer later for their incorrect, partisan view.  Decisions have their consequences. 

James West
Ringgold


Send Your Opinions To Chattanoogan.com

We welcome your opinions at Chattanoogan.com. Email to news@chattanoogan.com . We require your real first and last name and contact information. There is no word limit, but if your article is too long you may lose your reader. Please focus more on issues than personal attacks. (click for more)

Insurance Burden Should Not Fall On The Teachers

I have attended several Hamilton County School Board meetings over the past few months, including the recent special called meeting" to vote on teacher insurance changes. First, let me say I am very impressed with Superintendent Rick Smith and his staff at the Central Office.  Mr. Smith is a very dedicated public servant, working hard to provide services to our community ... (click for more)

Bradley, 24, Charged In Death Of Boy, 3; Child Had Numerous Injuries After Left With Boyfriend; Mother Was In Workhouse

Justin Dale Bradley has been charged with criminal homicide in the death of a three-year-old child, who was rushed to the hospital on Wednesday and later died. Police said Dakota James Arndt had numerous injuries over his body. Authorities said Bradley, 24, is the boyfriend of the child's mother, Brianna Kwekel, who was in the Workhouse at the time. Ms. Kwekel was serving 48 ... (click for more)

Helen Burns Sharp Asks Recovery Of Legal Fees In Successful Black Creek TIF Lawsuit

Helen Burns Sharp, citizen activist who sued to try to stop a $9 million Black Creek Tax Increment Financing (TIF) and won, is seeking to have her legal expenses paid by the city and the developers. Ms. Sharp said in a court filing that her legal bills to attorney John Konvalinka are $74,427 thus far. Chancellor Frank Brown ruled in favor of Ms. Sharp, saying the Sunshine ... (click for more)

Worley-Powered Vols Clobber Utah State, 38-7, In Opener

KNOXVILLE, Tenn. – Tennessee, trying to snap out of the doldrums of four consecutive losing seasons, started its 2014 campaign in fine fashion Sunday night before a season opening sellout crowd of 102,445 that endured a heavy rain story 30 minutes prior to kickoff. And senior quarterback Justin Worley, who missed the final four games in 2013 after undergoing thumb surgery, was ... (click for more)

Lookouts Reach Southern League Northern Division Playoffs With Doubleheader Win Over Smokies

The Chattanooga Lookouts are now playoff bound after sweeping a double-header against the Tennessee Smokies  to clinch the Southern League North Division for the second half of the season. The first game of the double-header was backed by a masterful gem of a game thrown by the starter for the Lookouts, Steve Smith (W, 3-2). Smith dominated the Smokies' lineup from top ... (click for more)