Jody Baker: Studies In The Literature Of Sherlock Holmes

Friday, February 07, 2014 - by Jody Baker

Ronald Knox (1888-1957) was a 23 year-old student at Oxford  when he issued a "paper," from which he later gave a lecture, entitled "Studies in the Literature of Sherlock Holmes." It was not Rev.. Knox's intent to launch an intellectual game for the lovers of the Sherlock Holmes tales. The intended purpose was to use the discussion of Sherlock Holmes tales to ridicule some practices among those who were dedicated to "Higher Learning." Knox began his work with this introduction:

"If there is anything pleasant in life, it is doing what we aren't meant to do.  If there is anything pleasant in criticism, it is finding out what we aren't meant to find out.  It is the method by which we treat as significant what the author did not mean to be significant, by which we single out as essential what the author regarded as incidental.  Thus, if one brings out a book on turnips, the modern scholar tries to discover from it whether the author was on good terms with his wife;  if a poet writes on buttercups, every word he says may be used as evidence against him at an inquest of his views on a future existence.  On this fascinating principle, we delight to extort economic evidence from Aristophanes, because Aristophanes knew nothing of economics: we try to extract cryptograms from Shakespeare, because we are inwardly certain that Shakespeare never put them there: we sift and winnow the Gospel of St. Luke, in order to produce a Synoptic problem, because St. Luke, poor man, never knew the Synoptic problem to exist.

"There is, however, a special fascination in applying this method to Sherlock Holmes, because it is, in a sense, Holmes's own method.  'It has long been an axiom of mine,' he says, 'that the little things are infinitely the most important.'  It might be the motto of his life's work. And it is, is it not, as we clergymen say, by the little things, the apparently unimportant things, that we judge of a man's character." 

For a full text of this lecture visit http://www.diogenes-club.com/studies.htm

Sidney Roberts (Cambridge) issued a reply some years following. Then several other essays and booklets followed. But it was in 1934 that Christopher Morley, aided by three-hour lunches lubricated by liquid refreshment, engaged the attention of the literary elite of New York and set the game afoot.  Punctuated by Morley's   *joi de vivre*,  the Grand Game grew and grew and grew into the giant attraction that it is today.

There are two major Societies: (1) The Baker Street Irregulars based here and (2) The Sherlock Holmes Society of London founded in 1951 on the other side of the Big Pond. There are two major encyclopedic annotated works: Baring-Gould's two-volume set and Klinger's multi-volume set. There are the major journals - Baker Street Journal and Sherlock Holmes Journal.

In the Sherlock Holmes Journal (Summer, 2011 ) an article was published which challenges the part that that tradition assigns to Knox's lecture in the birth and growth of the Grand Game. That article, The Ronald Knox Myth, acknowledges that Morley was in Oxford at the time of the lecture, but questions whether Morley heard the lecture or returned home with a copy of it. That author goes on to point out that: "Knox was not the first to peer beneath the surface of the Sherlock Holmes stories. Two other scholars had done so a decade earlier, Arthur Bartlett Maurice in The Bookman in America and Frank Sidgwick in The Cambridge Review in England, in January 1902 .... Sidgwick's was a one-time query about inconsistencies in Hound, but Maurice went on writing about the tales in his periodical for 25 years."

The author of the Journal article seeks to support the claim that Morley did not attend the Knox lecture by bringing forward negative proof: 

"As for Morley bringing Knox's paper to America, we don't even know if Morley heard it while at Oxford as a Rhodes Scholar in 1911. No diaries or appointment books of Morley's for 1911-12 exist, and no contemporary letters of his indicate that he did. And on the sole occasion that he referred to it as having been given at Oxford while he was there, in his 1944 book Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson: A Textbook of Friendship, Morley did not actually say he heard it. If you look up and not only see but observe the reference, one finds the BSI's founder indefinite on that point."

The author of the article has apparently overlooked or disregarded the admonition that: "Absence of proof is not proof of absence." 

So, what if accepted tradition is wrong? What if Morley did not attend the lecture? What if Morley did not bring a paper copy of the lecture with him when he returned home?  SO WHAT?

For years Morley was deeply interested in Sherlock Holmes. Morley was interested in playing the same games that formed the basis of Knox's lecture. A copy of Knox's lecture would have been  available to Morley, an editor at Doubleday.  The probability approaches certainty that Ronald Knox and the thoughts expressed in Knox's paper and repeated in his lecture had a strong and lasting influence upon the formation of The Baker Street Irregulars. If the thrust of the lecture was not the source, it was an influencing factor in the attitude and the atmosphere of the fun, frolic and frivolity with which the meetings were conducted. Little value was assigned by the BSI of the time to deep, ponderous and pedantic scholarship. The BSI followed in the footsteps of Studies in the Literature of Sherlock Holmes.

GREAT HEAVENS, HOW YOU HAVE GROWN!

There are books, upon books and more books. There are writings upon writings and more writings. There have been radio broadcasts over the years. Louis Hector (1934-1936); Orson Welles (1936); Basil Rathbone (1939-1946); Tom Conway (1946-1947); John Stanley (1947-1949); Ben Wright (1950); and John Gielgud (1955) See : http://www.greatdetectives.net/detectives/about/archive/sherlock-holmes/

Movies galore: A 1900 silent film http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYN4QzX9-EM; then Alwin Neuß (1908-1914); William Gillette as Sherlock Holmes (1916): Hugo Flink (1917); John Barrymoore, as Sherlock Holmes with William Powell (debut) and Hedda Hopper (1922); Eille Norwood (1921-23); Carlyle Blackwell (1929); Raymond Massey (1931) [For more detail see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List of_actors_who_have_played_Sherlock_Holmes and see: http://www.worlds-best-detective-crime-and-murder-mystery-books.com/sherlock-holmes-in-film02.html

And, more recently Basil Rathbone, of course - and Arthur Wotner ; Peter Cushing; Ronald Howard; and Jeremy Brett.

Newcomers to the movie scene are Benedict Cumberbatch (in Sherlock), Johnny Lee Miller (in Elementary) and Robert Downey, Jr. (in Sherlock Holmes). The very latest seems to be a Sherlock app (whatever, in thunder, that is). See http://www.sherlocktheapp.com.

Little did Ronald Knox and Christopher Morley know what they were setting loose upon the world. It began as a literary trickle, grew to a stream and cascaded to a torrent --- and now a flood of Sherlockiana throughout the world. 

Respectfully,
Inspector Baynes


(Jody Baker is a Chattanooga attorney, who specializes in Sherlock Holmes lore. He can be reached at josiahbaker@bkhcw.com.)
 



Dennis Norwood: Mr. President, Put Down Your Fiddle. Rome Is Burning

It would appear as if our president has all but given up - not only on his presidency - but on governing at all. With crisis after crisis at every turn there is no late night candle burning in the White House. Instead that candle is lighting the way for a series of fundraising events. This, my friends, scares me. Not as a Republican or Democrat, but as an American. Mr. ... (click for more)

Go Vols, Go Weston

All Tennesseans know what it's like to have a lawyer coaching the UT Vols football team and another one representing the Third District as congressman.  All we need to know now is how many Tennesseans will vote to find out what it's like to have Weston Wamp, son of the best congressman (Zach Wamp) the Third District ever had, representing us.  We have a young, energetic ... (click for more)

Erlanger Health System Projecting $10.8 Million Profit - With Help From $19 Million In Federal Funds

Erlanger Health System is projecting a $10.8 million profit for the upcoming fiscal year - with the help of $19 million in federal funds from a pool for public hospitals. The $19 million received in time for the current budget helped avoid a sizable deficit. The hospital is hoping the federal funds will be coming on an annual basis. At the start of the last fiscal year, ... (click for more)

History Center Gets $400,000 Grant From National Endowment For The Arts

The National Endowment for the Humanities has awarded grants totaling more than $800,000 to three Tennessee projects that aim to display and preserve historical materials. Winning grants Monday included the Chattanooga History Center, which will get $400,000 to install a permanent, multimedia exhibit on the history of Chattanooga. The University of Tennessee-Knoxville will ... (click for more)

Chattanooga FC To Host NPSL National Semifinals Saturday

After two straight weekends of back-to-back playoff victories, winning both the Southeastern and South Region championships, Chattanooga FC is in the NPSL National Playoffs powered by Mitre. The club received news today that its #2 ranking in the league means that the NPSL National Semifinal match will be hosted this Saturday in Finley Stadium. "We are extremely pleased to be ... (click for more)

Local Swimmers Excel At Georgia, Tennessee State Meets

Several Chattanooga-area swimmers had successful weekends in various meets this past weekend. The McCallie/GPS Aquatics team finished sixth out of 50 teams at the Southeastern Swimming Championship in Knoxville while swimmers from Fort Oglethorpe and Ringgold also had memorable performances at the Georgia State Meet, also held last weekend. The McCallie/GPS team recorded ... (click for more)