Citizens To Comment Next Tuesday On Sound Control Ordinance That Allows Higher Sound Around Downtown Clubs

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Citizens will be allowed to comment next Tuesday on a new Sound Control Ordinance that allows higher sound from nightclubs in a downtown Controlled Sound Boundary.

Track 29 behind the Chattanooga Choo Choo, that has drawn the wrath of some nearby Southside residents, is within the boundary, which goes from Fourth Street to Main Street.

The hearing before the City Council will be at City Hall at 4 p.m.

Councilman Chris Anderson said five speakers on each side would be allowed to speak to the council.

A number of Southside residents recently took Track 29 to City Court on the noise issue. The club, headed by Adam Kinsey, paid the fines and there was no hearing.

One Adams Street resident invited council members to come to his house after 9 p.m. to check out the sounds from Track 29.

Here is the ordinance:

To address recent comments from both citizens and business owners, the City Attorney’s Office has worked with more than a dozen stakeholders to produce the following Sound Ordinance. This Ordinance includes feedback, input and suggestions from both residents and business and accomplishes the following:

(1) Increases ability to enforce violations;
(2) introduces the dB(C) measurement as an additional method of measurement;
(3) creates a defined area of the City allowing establishments to apply for a permit to increase their allowable sound level;
(4) changes the method of measuring the sound output to the property line of the origin of the sound; and
(5) clearly defines the permitting process for those businesses located in the defined area that seek an exception to the sound level requirements.
? Sound Levels /Times
o Addition of maximum dB(C) levels: Present Code provisions limit only the dB(A) levels emitted by sound sources. The Code revision will set limits for dB(C) sound levels.
o Increased sound levels for businesses: Businesses located in the proposed Controlled Sound Boundary (“CSB”) may obtain a permit that will allow the business to emit sound at levels higher than the levels set forth in Code Sec. 25-69(a). Depending on the time of day, the proposed Code revisions will set forth a maximum dB(A) and dB(C) levels as measured at the property line of the business. Those businesses that obtain a permit will have to abide by those new sound levels and times. The new levels and times proposed are as follows:
Time (Monday –Thursday) Sound Level Limit dB(A) Sound Level Limit dB(C)

3:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.     55      NA
11:00 a.m. – 11:00 p.m.   80       95
11:00 p.m. – 3:00 a.m.    65        80

Time (Friday – Sunday) Sound Level Limit dB(A) Sound Level Limit dB(C)

3:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m.  55   NA
11:00 a.m. – 12:00 a.m. 80  95
12:00 a.m. – 3:00 a.m.   65  80

Regulation and CSB Permitting Application Process
o Controlled Sound Boundary (“CSB”): The increased sound levels would only apply to those entities located in the CSB. The CSB area is shown on the map below:
 

o The Code revision will require that facilities that anticipate it will be unable to comply with the sound levels set forth in Code Sec. 25-69(a) must obtain a CSB Permit. Permits will only be issued within the CSB. A summary of the permitting process is found below:
? Persons desiring a CSB Permit shall apply to the Land Development Office with all required information;
? The application shall set forth all actions taken to comply with the noise level limits set forth in Code Sec. 25-69(a), the reasons why compliance cannot be feasibly achieved, the reasons for such determination, the actions that have been taken to comply with the noise level limits set forth in Code Sec. 25-69(a), a proposed method for complying as nearly as is feasible, and a proposed time schedule for its accomplishment.
? The application shall be accompanied by a fee. A separate application shall be filed for each sound source.
? The applicant shall send notice to each of the property owners within a minimum of 300 feet of each property for which a CSB Permit has been requested. The notice shall state all of the pertinent information and must be mailed at least fourteen (14) days prior to any action on the application by the Land Development Office. Notice shall also be published in a daily paper at least fourteen (14) days prior to any action on the application by the Land Development Office.
? Persons objecting to the relief sought by the applicant or interested in the review or determination made by the Land Development Office may likewise set forth their views and actual evidence in writing, signed by the objectors, and filed with the Land Development Office.
? The Land Development Office may grant a CSB Permit if the Land Development Office finds, after full consideration of all of the facts, that strict compliance with the noise level limits set forth in Code Sec. 25-69(a) will cause practical difficulties, unnecessary hardship, or unreasonable expense.
o A CSB Permit may be subject to any terms, conditions, and requirements as the Land Development Office deems reasonable to achieve maximum compliance with the provisions of the Controlled Sound Ordinance. The terms, conditions and requirements may include limitations on noise levels and operating hours.
o Each CSB Permit shall set forth the approved method of achieving maximum compliance and a time schedule for its accomplishment. The Land Development Office shall consider the magnitude of nuisance caused by the offensive noise, the uses of property within the area of impingement by the noise, the time factors related to study, design, financing and construction of remedial work, the economic factors related to age and useful life of equipment and the general public interest and welfare.
o Decisions of the Land Development Office may be appealed within ten (10) days to the Board of Controlled Sound Boundaries Permit Appeals.
? Enforcement
o City Court enforcement will remain unchanged as the penalties now in place are the maximum allowed under the Tennessee Constitution. The fine will be per violation.
o Facilities that have been allowed to exceed the Code Sec. 25-69(a) sound levels through the permitting process could have its permit suspended and/or revoke upon violations of sound level limits.
o Facilities that hold permits from city regulatory boards will be cited to that board if the facility violates the sound Code. The board will suspend or revoke the permit issued by that board. [This means, for example, that a violation of the sound Code will also result in a citation to the Beer Board. The Beer Board will either suspend or revoke the beer permit. Under Tennessee Law, the Beer Board must notify the Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission (TABC) of the Beer Board’s action and the TABC may take similar action.]
? Review
o There will be a one year review of the impact of the ordinance and permitting process presented to Council.
? Next Steps
o Public hearing on July 29, 2014 for presentation, comments, and review.
o First reading August 5, 2014.
o Coordinate with a consultant or city partner to advise on training on CSB permitting process.
o Complete draft of permit application and FAQ’s.

Latest Hamilton County Jail Booking Report

Here is the latest jail booking report from Hamilton County: ADEWOLE, OLUWASAYO SAMUEL  1164 CLEMONS STREET CLEVELAND, 373114458  Age at Arrest: 21 years old Arresting Agency: Chattanooga DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE LIGHT LAW VIOLATION DRIVING ON ROADWAYS LANED FOR TRAFFIC, VIOLATION --- ALLEN, KENNETH EUGENE  3114 8TH AVE CHATTANOOGA, 37407  ... (click for more)

Judge Rules In Favor Of Dyer Motion, Against Brennan Request In Investment Scheme Case

Federal Judge Travis McDonough has ruled in favor of a motion by Doug Dyer and against a motion by James Brennan. The SEC filed a civil action against the pair, saying they had carried out an investment scheme. Authorities said they will likely face criminal charges. Dyer had sought to be able to use the proceeds of a personal loan to pay an attorney in the criminal case. ... (click for more)

Slaxxon Regret - And Response

Back in the seventies my three oldest brothers had a buddy named Steve Slack. “Slack” was a star soccer player at Baylor and he grew up on Lookout Mountain, which is where I grew up. He and Jimmy, Henry and Bill went to the University of Virginia where they were roommates in an old, beat up house that was painted pink. Naturally, the place became known as the “Pink Palace” but lest ... (click for more)

Roy Exum: This Library Comes Alive

I am pretty positive that I haven’t stepped foot in a library in the last 50 years. Between the ever-widening Internet, with all of its search engines and infinite resources, I have got about as much use for a library as I would if I read a book about a transgender person. I have neither the time or inclination. Be like trying to teach a pig to sing – the pig always get bored. ... (click for more)

Mocs Finish Third At Furman Intercollegiate

The Chattanooga Mocs men’s golf team finished tied for third at the Furman Intercollegiate. They did so behind senior Wes Gosselin’s runner-up performance.   Gosselin shot a career-best 10-under 206. It’s the eighth time a Moc has finished 10-under or better, the first since Stephan Jaeger’s school-record 203 (-13) winning the 2012 NCAA Bowling Green Regional   ... (click for more)

DecoTurf Tennis: Walton Edges Baylor Gilrls, 4-3 for A Division Title

Top-seeded Walton (Ga.) defeated No.2 Baylor, 4-3, in the finals of the Girls A Division Saturday. Highlighted by Liz Norman’s (Walton) 6-1, 6-0 triumph against Baylor’s Drew Haskins at No.1 singles, Walton also picked up wins from No.4 Samantha Buyckx and No.5 Grace Gaskins, plus the doubles point to secure the win. Walton won Decoturf in 2015 and lost to Baylor last ... (click for more)