They Had To Pass The Bill To Find Out What Was In It

Friday, July 4, 2014
In 1993, the Democratic majority controlled Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (SFRA).  With great fanfare, the Democrats' recently-elected President, Bill Clinton, signed the bill into law.  The law has had some controversy with several decisions over the last 20 years by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).  In one case, the SCOTUS did rule the law could not be imposed upon the states, but generally it has been upheld.  

Now, after 20 years as law of the land, many Democrats are expressing alarm at what the law requires.
 Namely, as the SCOTUS recently ruled, the law requires that any government mandates not exempted from the law that impinge upon a person’s religious liberty must be the “least restrictive alternative” to achieve the government’s compelling interest.  In the ruling, the court noted that the HHS had offered accommodation to some religious groups.  As such, the imposition upon Hobby Lobby was not the “least restrictive alternative” to achieve the government’s interest and the HHS mandate was in violation of the RFRA.

Now we hear from national and local Democrats that they are shocked at what was in the bill that became the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.  Apparently, the RFRA protects religious beliefs from wanton impositions by government officials and requires that any requirement imposed to fulfill a compelling governmental interest be the least restrictive alternative.  What that “least restrictive alternative” is remains to be determined in future SCOTUS decisions, but we know it isn’t as the bureaucrats imposed in the law.  

Now this all comes about because of another bill passed by a Democratic majority controlled Congress and signed into law by a recently elected Democrat president.  That bill was the Patient Affordable Care Act, colloquially known as, Obamacare.  Of that bill, House Speaker Pelosi said that they had to pass the bill to see what was in it.  Given their surprise at what was in the RFRA, perhaps we should be nervous about what will be found in the much longer and complex Obamacare law.  

However, one thing we now know is not in the Obamacare law, and could have been added so very easily, with just a single sentence, is an exemption from the RFRA.  Surprise for the Democrats who passed the bill?  Or did they leave the exemption out to keep support for passing the legislation?  Perhaps it was just an oversight.  If we remember, the bill was thrown together late at night then rushed to a vote with no time for it to be read, i.e., they had to pass it to find out what was in it.  Some Congressional aide could have dozed off and lost their place when they wrote the bill up leaving out the sentence?

What we do know is, back in 1993, a Democratic majority controlled Congress and a Democrat president enacted a law that now, 20 years later, many Democrats, a good many of them in that Congress or involved in that White House are shocked, shocked they say, at what was in the bill.  

Of course, they don’t frame their response that way.   Instead they say it is a war on women.  When in reality it is simply a group of bureaucrats in Washington who couldn’t be bothered in complying with the law of the land as they decided that employers must provide “free” birth control, including those that act after conception.  The bureaucrats with their Democrat administration political leaders decided that the religious beliefs of those now required to provide this “free” benefit were to be run roughshod over.  

Imagine their surprise to discover that the law of the land applies even to government bureaucrats and agencies.  At least in this instance.

Jeff K. Brown
Georgetown

Remembering Brave Soldiers Who Died Under The Confederate Flag

One hundred fifty-four years ago over a million men, aged 12-70, took up arms and left their homes and families to defend their way of life as they knew it.  Accurate records didn't exist back then, but as many as 500,000 would die from fighting, disease, starvation and an almost total lack of medical treatment.   Most of those who fought were farmers, blacksmiths, ... (click for more)

Time For A Bilateral Session

Congressman Jim Cooper recently called on state lawmakers to “reconsider the Insure Tennessee plan to expand Medicaid in Tennessee.” He said that the U.S. Supreme Court has now cleared all obstacles for the state to proceed. Medicaid expansion is a prime example of where state and federal solutions compete.   The Supreme Court’s recent decision redefining ... (click for more)

Healy Says Bass Pro Shop At East Ridge To Get Underway Next Month, New Hotel, Restaurants Planned Nearby; Sewers Are An Issue

Commercial realtor John Healy said Thursday that construction is set to start next month on the Bass Pro Shop at Exit 1 in East Ridge. He said it is due to open next May. Mr. Healy also said Wolftever Development that is carrying out the project has also bought additional land near the Bass Pro Shop site at the entrance to Camp Jordan Park. He said one purchase is America's Best ... (click for more)

Work Set To Start In October On $28 Million Retail, Office, Apartment Development At The 700 Block of Market Street

An Atlanta developer said work will start in October on a $28 million retail, office and apartment complex in the long-vacant middle of the 700 block of Market Street. Boyd Simpson of the Simpson Company said the project was made possible because his firm also owns the adjacent SunTrust Tower and can use some of its excess parking for occupants of the new building. He said ... (click for more)

Weather Prevails As Ridgeside, Red Bank Ends In A Draw

The Red Bank Gators and the Ridgeside Dolphins were supposed to swim each other for the second time in three days, but the overall winner was the weather man. The meet had not yet reached the midway point when lightning, thunder and heavy rain caused a delay with Ridgeside leading 165-156 following the medley relays. After a discussion with the respective pool reps, coaches ... (click for more)

Lookouts - Barons Thursday Double Header Postponed

For the second consecutive day, the Lookouts have been unable to play the Birmingham Barons at AT&T Field due to inclement weather. Thursday night's scheduled games were cancelled following the same on Wednesday night. Game one will be made up  tomorrow  ( July 3rd ) as part of a doubleheader at  5:15 p.m .  Both games will be seven innings ... (click for more)