They Had To Pass The Bill To Find Out What Was In It

Friday, July 4, 2014
In 1993, the Democratic majority controlled Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (SFRA).  With great fanfare, the Democrats' recently-elected President, Bill Clinton, signed the bill into law.  The law has had some controversy with several decisions over the last 20 years by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).  In one case, the SCOTUS did rule the law could not be imposed upon the states, but generally it has been upheld.  

Now, after 20 years as law of the land, many Democrats are expressing alarm at what the law requires.
 Namely, as the SCOTUS recently ruled, the law requires that any government mandates not exempted from the law that impinge upon a person’s religious liberty must be the “least restrictive alternative” to achieve the government’s compelling interest.  In the ruling, the court noted that the HHS had offered accommodation to some religious groups.  As such, the imposition upon Hobby Lobby was not the “least restrictive alternative” to achieve the government’s interest and the HHS mandate was in violation of the RFRA.

Now we hear from national and local Democrats that they are shocked at what was in the bill that became the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.  Apparently, the RFRA protects religious beliefs from wanton impositions by government officials and requires that any requirement imposed to fulfill a compelling governmental interest be the least restrictive alternative.  What that “least restrictive alternative” is remains to be determined in future SCOTUS decisions, but we know it isn’t as the bureaucrats imposed in the law.  

Now this all comes about because of another bill passed by a Democratic majority controlled Congress and signed into law by a recently elected Democrat president.  That bill was the Patient Affordable Care Act, colloquially known as, Obamacare.  Of that bill, House Speaker Pelosi said that they had to pass the bill to see what was in it.  Given their surprise at what was in the RFRA, perhaps we should be nervous about what will be found in the much longer and complex Obamacare law.  

However, one thing we now know is not in the Obamacare law, and could have been added so very easily, with just a single sentence, is an exemption from the RFRA.  Surprise for the Democrats who passed the bill?  Or did they leave the exemption out to keep support for passing the legislation?  Perhaps it was just an oversight.  If we remember, the bill was thrown together late at night then rushed to a vote with no time for it to be read, i.e., they had to pass it to find out what was in it.  Some Congressional aide could have dozed off and lost their place when they wrote the bill up leaving out the sentence?

What we do know is, back in 1993, a Democratic majority controlled Congress and a Democrat president enacted a law that now, 20 years later, many Democrats, a good many of them in that Congress or involved in that White House are shocked, shocked they say, at what was in the bill.  

Of course, they don’t frame their response that way.   Instead they say it is a war on women.  When in reality it is simply a group of bureaucrats in Washington who couldn’t be bothered in complying with the law of the land as they decided that employers must provide “free” birth control, including those that act after conception.  The bureaucrats with their Democrat administration political leaders decided that the religious beliefs of those now required to provide this “free” benefit were to be run roughshod over.  

Imagine their surprise to discover that the law of the land applies even to government bureaucrats and agencies.  At least in this instance.

Jeff K. Brown
Georgetown

Why Is Congress So Bad?

As of April 11th, according to Gallup polling, Congressional approval stood at twenty percent.  Let's think about that. Eighty percent of Americans disapproved of the way the United States Congress operates! Then, at the next election, we send the same people back expecting a different outcome.  Why?   We seem to vote for folks who say they want to work ... (click for more)

Fake Science Of Man-Made Beliefs - And Response

In Chattanooga last Saturday approximately 1,000 people joined a faith-based group calling itself "March for Science - Chattanooga" who demanded that you and me pay for their special beliefs in fake science.  Their sincere, deeply held beliefs are found on their Facebook page.  And, they are not alone.  Thousands of other people of similar faith marched in various ... (click for more)

Erlanger Has Surge In Revenue; Admissions Up Over 12%

Erlanger Health System reported substantial growth in revenue and effective cost management for the third quarter. Net income from operations of $8.5 million exceeded prior year by $7 million and also exceeded budget by $1.3 million.    The health system had an 8.8 percent increase in total net revenue. Officials said the quarter generated strong EBITDA (e arnings ... (click for more)

Trenton, Ga., Woman Gets Workhouse Time, Lengthy Supervised Probation In Hit-And-Run Death Of Man On Moped

A Trenton, Ga. woman was given a four-year sentence following a lengthy hearing in the December 2012 hit-and-run death of a man in St. Elmo. Betty Mundy will serve 11 months and 29 days of the sentence in the workhouse and then be under a lengthy supervised probation, Judge Barry Steelman said.  She was charged in the death of 56-year-old David Joe Bruce. She pleaded ... (click for more)

Defense, Pitching Sparkle In Owls' 4-0 Win Vs. Mustangs

Strong defense meant more for Ooltewah than any other aspect of Monday’s key District 5-3A prep baseball game against Walker Valley at A.C. “Bud” Ball Field. ** Owls center fielder Jake Sullivan made an ESPN-worthy diving catch in left-center that probably saved two runs in the first inning. ** Pitcher Daniel Willie picked off a Mustangs runner at first base in the ... (click for more)

PHOTOS: Ooltewah Shuts Out Walker Valley, 4-0