Veteran Against The Domestic Partner Ordinance - And Response (3)

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

I write as a retired military member who spent 30 years on active duty.  My final overseas assignment was in southeast Afghanistan.  Upholding the Constitution and defending our way of life is vitally important to me.     

Our traditional American values are precious and must be protected.  Accordingly, my friends and I are against Chattanooga’s Domestic Partner Ordinance.   

The ordinance undercuts the institution of marriage; an institution established when the world was created.  Rather than supporting long-term unions of a man and a woman forever, the ordinance promotes temporary, unstable situations with multiple partners … all at the expense of the taxpayers and society.  

Instead, the city should spend its money on projects that will the benefit the greatest number of Chattanoogans.  For example, a recent survey of the streets reported the city needs about $5 million per year just to maintain the streets.  This does not include building new ones or performing heavy repair.  The street budget was a little over half that amount this year.  The city is not keeping pace with this vital municipal requirement and all Chattanoogans will suffer if more money is not allocated to the roads. 

Chattanooga should also pay better salaries and pensions to all employees instead of diverting money to domestic partner benefits for a relative few.  Before my military career, I served as a firefighter, deputy sheriff/coroner and emergency medical technician so I know the rigors of those jobs and the importance of supporting all employees.    

The so-called protections in the ordinance are equally troublesome.  The city has adequately handled employment decisions using existing law.  The value and dignity of employees have been protected.  A former affirmative action supervisor (and combat veteran) stated during the hearings prior to the city council’s adoption of the ordinance that existing laws were fair and properly administered.  Nothing new is needed.   

In fact, this section of the ordinance should concern people who love the First Amendment.  It contains no provisions to protect the closely-held religious beliefs of employees. The Religious Freedom Restoration Act signed into law by President Clinton is the law of the land and failure to place language protecting free speech and religious views in the ordinance is a significant omission.    

The Domestic Partner Ordinance should be voted down.  Now is the time for all Chattanoogans to stand up for traditional American values and to reaffirm the American way of life by voting against the ordinance.     

Christopher R. Dooley
Col(ret), USAF
Chattanooga

* * *

You said this, sir:

The ordinance undercuts the institution of marriage; an institution established when the world was created.  Rather than supporting long-term unions of a man and a woman forever, the ordinance promotes temporary, unstable situations with multiple partners … all at the expense of the taxpayers and society.   

I beg to differ with you, sir....The institution of marriage was created by Judeo-Christian priests, when they discovered they could make some serious money at it, and made it a 'sacrement'.

Our world has been here for billions of years, you are wrong. I support the facts.

Vote for same sex benefits is the correct solution. Knoxville has already done it.

Donald Woods
Knoxville

* * *  

I voted early in favor of the Domestic Partner Ordinance to honor the memory of victims like Mathew Shepard and a young man sent to prison and died during a time when interracial relationships were taboo and illegal. I feel this is a most appropriate time and way to truly honor their memory and others like them and to take a stand against intolerance, bigotry and hate wherever it rears its ugly head. Today it's against gays. Tomorrow that pendulum could just as easily swing back to people who look like me, as it's been known to do. 

Vote yes. 

Brenda Manghane-Washington 

* * * 

Mr. Woods statement on the history of marriage is interesting.  It is interesting because he gives absolutely no evidence for his statement.  If you are going to make such a statement, please present some facts to back it up.  If you supply no facts then it is either conjecture, or more seriously, invented. 

Mr. Woods obviously does not understand the term “Judeo-Christian.”  He writes as though Jewish rabbis and Christian pastors/priests got together one day over tea and dreamed up this marriage thing.  Mr. Woods does not even understand that the term is used to describe the principles found in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible.  The Old Testament contains the same Scriptures that Jewish people believe.  The Old Testament is the foundation of the Christian beliefs.  Jews and Christians have a vast difference in belief on who Jesus Christ is, which is what is set forth in the New Testament.   

Good scholarship demands the presentation of evidence when countering a stated viewpoint.  I have presented evidence, not opinion, on the problems with Mr. Woods response. 

Mark Harwood
Sale Creek


Send Your Opinions To Chattanoogan.com

We welcome your opinions at Chattanoogan.com. Email to  news@chattanoogan.com . We require your real first and last name and contact information. There is no word limit, but if your article is too long you may lose your reader. Please focus more on issues than personal attacks. (click for more)

Roy Exum: 40 Questions About ‘Blue Bags’

No. 1 – Did you know that one in every five of the 42,000 children in the Hamilton County school district is what the experts call “food deprived?” No. 2 – Can you get your arms around the fact that a huge percentage of those 8,400 children get little, if nothing, to eat from Friday at lunch until they return to our schools on Monday? No. 3 -- Did you know that you – just ... (click for more)

Red Bank Commercial Centers Sell For $9.4 Million

Two nearby Red Bank retail centers have sold for a combined $9.4 million. Red Bank Mayor John Roberts called it "the largest transactions in the history of Red Bank." The Red Bank Town Center at 3901 Dayton Blvd., that includes a Food City, sold for $7,750,000. The sale was  to White Realty & Service Corp from Red Bank Ii Llc. A commercial center that includes ... (click for more)

Jury Awards 25 City Police Personnel Total Of $562,000 On Claims That Pay Plan Was Not Followed

A Chancery Court jury on Wednesday gave a verdict totaling $562,000 for 25 city police personnel who filed suit almost five years ago alleging that the city never lived up to terms of a 2010 pay plan. Attorney Stevie Phillips, who tried the case along with Janie Parks Varnell, said, "The jury awarded each officer what we had asked for to the penny." She stated, "These 25 members ... (click for more)

Sale Creek Storms Past Central, 3-0, In Volleyball Action

Despite playing short-handed, Sale Creek’s once-beaten Lady Panthers made short work of Central, 3-0, Thursday night in high school volleyball action at Central High School. The Lady Panthers sprinted to their 11 th win in 12 matches this season by whipping Central 25-21, 25-13, 25-8 in the non-district matchup. “We played well today,” Sale Creek coach Debbie Hill said. ... (click for more)

Grace Wins In Celebration Of Coach Waters' Birthday

The Grace Academy volleyball team had several reasons to play well at Silverdale on Thursday night, not to mention that it was head coach Hillary Waters’ birthday. Facing the Lady Seahawks in a key District 5-A match, the Lady Golden Eagles did what they had to do as they won the match in four sets as they improved to 6-2 overall and 3-0 in 5-A. Set scores were 25-15, ... (click for more)