Tax Increment Financing And Blight - And Response

Wednesday, February 14, 2018

Chattanooga’s downtown markets are remarkably strong, stronger than most anyone could have imagined just a couple of decades ago. Thanks to massive public investments in infrastructure and amenities, developers and businesses now find downtown an attractive place to invest private capital. Though additional development incentives were needed in the early years to subsidize private investments, most such incentives are just giveaways now. 

A giveaway is not a strategy. It’s not even an action verb. It’s a noun. A giveaway is something that belongs to taxpayers but is handed over for private interests to claim as profit, personal income, and whatever other private gains are hidden in the “soft costs” of the project. 

Considering all the wealth that will be generated by all the development the MLK Boulevard extension will service, taxpayers should require the developers to make the street improvements and dedicate the reconstructed right-of-way to the city for maintenance. That is the way market driven development is done elsewhere. For all practical purposes, the roadway already exists and only needs to be improved anyway. The project simply does not need TIF, that is, unless this so-called “strategy” depends entirely on the taxpayers to meet the “needs” of just this one Nashville real estate developer. The MLK extension does not and should not depend on that. There are surely other developers less needy. 

By law, TIF is for “blighted areas.” This is not a blighted area by any stretch of the imagination. It is dishonest to try to pass this TIF proposal’s purpose off as having anything to do with eliminating blight. To claim that in the “economic impact plan” raises serious, very serious ethics questions, both political and professional. To take a financial resource dedicated to blighted areas and give it away to wealthy developers in one of the hottest commercial markets in the state, is to quite literally steal from the poor to give to the rich. For that reason, this TIF proposal raises serious, very serious moral questions as well. Indeed, this TIF proposal is about the most blatant, obvious, and shameful example of poverty pimping I have ever seen, and that statement is coming from someone who has done an awful lot of professional work on behalf of the poorest communities in this country. (I’ve seen it all, and I’ve seen enough.) 

Chattanooga has four major contiguous long blighted commercial and industrial market areas, plus a few other smaller pockets of blight. That does not include commercial areas in Brainerd that are marginalized and at risk of blight because Eastgate (for some mysterious reason) never seems to merit the same consideration for interstate access that CBL is awarded once every decade just for the asking. The remaining blighted areas are THE areas that need strategies for major public investment in infrastructure and amenities, along with development incentives like TIF and PILOT. How is it that the first greenway ever included in a city plan was proposed along Chattanooga Creek, yet it remains the last place to ever see one, if it ever will? 

Now that Chattanooga’s gentry enjoys the fruits of massive public investments and development incentives for downtown, the riverfront, and Enterprise South, the only barriers to doing the same, but on a much smaller scale, in our remaining blighted areas are blighted hearts.

Frank Wrinn 

* * * 

Excellent, Mr. Wrinn. 

Joey Blevins



Good Riddance Of Mayor As Trustee Of The Confederate Cemetery

After reading the news piece titled, City Files Petition to Turn Confederate Cemetery Over To Sons Of The Confederacy, and prior articles quoting Mayor Berke on the subject of the historic cemetery, it is appropriate for the city to withdraw as trustee.  The public position statements of the mayor regarding the cemetery demonstrate that he is completely unfit to serve as ... (click for more)

Send Your Opinions To Chattanoogan.com; Include Your Full Name, Address, Phone Number For Verification

We welcome your opinions at Chattanoogan.com. Email to  news@chattanoogan.com . We require your real first and last name and contact information. This includes your home address and phone number. We do not post the contact information, but need it for verification. There is no word limit, but if your article is too long you may lose your reader. Please focus more ... (click for more)

Signal Facing Decisions On Expanding Commercial Area Past Albert Road, Mountain Community Center And Water Service

The design review committee (DRC) of the town of Signal Mountain is in the process of establishing standards for commercial buildings. In the meantime, developer Bob Elliott would like to buy property at the corner of Taft Highway and Albert Road. Albert Road has traditionally been where the commercial property ends. A number of residents in the neighborhood around that area are ... (click for more)

Initiative Launches In Support Of Signal Mountain’s Water System; Tennessee-American Says It Has Long Provided Clean Water To Signal

A citizen committee is urging Signal Mountain "to be vocal and choose local" in the imminent water department sale. The local group formed “Be Vocal. Choose Local.” after the town of Signal Mountain voted last May to initiate a Request for Proposals for the acquisition of its water department.  The committee urges the town to sell its water system to Walden’s Ridge Utility ... (click for more)

Bearettes Wallop Warren, 87-22, In Region 3-3A For 61st Win In 62 Games

CLEVELAND, Tenn. – Bradley Central is the state’s No. 2-ranked girls’ team, according to MaxPreps. The Bearettes (29-0) is the District 5-3A tournament champion. Visiting Warren County has a sub-.500 record and is the No. 4 team out of District 6-3A. So, on Friday night at Jim Smiddy Arena, the Bearettes played the favorite’s role perfectly and humbled the Lady Pioneers, ... (click for more)

Signal Mountain Teams Avoid Upset Bids By Sequoyah

Both Sequoyah basketball teams came to Signal Mountain Friday night for Region 3-AA quarterfinal games as fourth-place finishers in District 5-AA and both with losing records. Apparently, they weren’t ready to turn in their equipment just yet as they played like there was no tomorrow against the host teams. Both teams from Madisonville ended up on the short end of the final ... (click for more)