Wanting A Publix That Better Suits The Location And Community - And Response (2)

Sunday, December 9, 2018

In his opinion piece, “Quit Embarrassing Us,” Rox Exum misses the point. He writes, “I cannot speak for those who oppose the renewal of South Broad Street but…what is puzzling to me is…why more don’t embrace it and join in what our overall community needs the most: our encouragement.”

No one who opposes the Publix development in its proposed form opposes the renewal of South Broad Street. Indeed, a primary reason that we oppose a suburban-style Publix is because it would stifle the kind of development we want long-term on South Broad.

Quite specifically, it flies in the face of South Broad Street Study and the vision for South Broad that City Council adopted earlier this year after months of community input and with the support of those Mr. Exum recognizes as “visionaries."

The Atlanta-based developer for the project wishes to take the easy and more profitable way out rather than creating a setting that will benefit Chattanooga long-term. What we want is a mixed-use development that promotes higher employment and increased property tax revenues and potentially includes affordable housing. The same type of development more responsible developers have partnered with Publix to create in similar settings throughout the Southeast.

A Publix on South Broad will happen regardless of the votes of the Board of Zoning Appeals, the Regional Planning Commission, or the City Council. Publix knows it’s a gold mine of a location. So hold the developer to a higher standard.

People like Roy Exum who want Publix no matter what simply end up mortgaging our future and derailing the long-term promise for South Broad. Is it really an embarrassment that there are those of us who want a Publix that better suits the location and is better for our city?                                    

Jim Johnson
Chattanoogans for Responsible Development

* * * 

Mr. Johnson writes well his stance on logical development on South Broad Street. This city has a long history of enjoying community input into planning processes and then caving in to developers. It's one thing to have multiple developers go by standards and grow a community. It is another to have those follow the rules and have one come in and say we are above them.

We have in Lookout Valley one giant store with a grocery component, a strip mall adjacent, and two strip malls that have all but withered as their anchor tenant groceries died after that giant box opened. I voiced opposition to the giant box in Lookout Valley and enjoyed a huge win, construction was delayed 30 days. One advisor to then Mayor Corker called it sales tax reallocation as tax coffers did not fill so much as they changed the place of source. So this fine hill with a huge stand of hickory trees became asphalt prairie with crowds of cars  and trucks and retail therapy.

If you want to see how progress gets done in Chattanooga look at the rule book and look at the variance log of all the places that need a break from rules to plant here. One huge box got located in a conservation area, no one cares about that, besides the legal outcome of that was rendered confidential by the party that paid out.

I for one agree, if you are going to set design standards go by them or don’t draw forward thinking people to feel they have a say then yank the rug out. A good case in point are retail signage height standards. The really tall signs got there by variance. Obviously here in Lookout Valley the pigeons need hawks to have high roosts that are man-made, and garish signs planted atop to lure unsuspecting flat landers to buy fuel, bad food or whatever. 

As for that other writer's tantalizing taunt that the two lane width rail underpasses are in planning for widening, show me the drawings.  I doubt they exist. I’d be surprised the engineer who will approve them is even out of elementary school, much less in college.  

Prentice Hicks

* * * 

Did I miss something? It’s almost as if the author envisioned that the property was owned by the community at large. I thought the property where the proposed Publix may be located was owned by private individuals…you know….as in “private property”? Instead, the bulk of the commentary has phrases like “What we want is a mixed-use development that promotes higher employment,” “increased property tax revenues,” and “potentially includes affordable housing.”

Admittedly those are lofty goals and it would be great if they could just happen.  In fact, they are just awesome…..to that end, I’d like an F-18 for my own use,  mandatory happy hour at Flying Squirrel every afternoon, and a month of paid vacation somewhere in the Caribbean with a sailboat piloted by UGA cheerleaders.  Unfortunately, as much as I’d like it, I can’t have it unless I can buy it (also it would likely involve excessive future purgatory time).

Again, I may have just fallen off the turnip truck but the phrase, “The Atlanta-based developer for the project wishes to take the easy and more profitable way out rather than creating a setting that will benefit Chattanooga long-term” sounds a bit as if the author thinks that a developer somehow takes on a tremendous financial risk so that that he can provide an altruistic avocado toast heaven for the community at large and do so at a loss. As such, it will likely come as a shock but profit is not only why a developer does a project, but profit is also not a dirty word. Profit is where taxes come from, profit is why companies exist, profit is the lifeblood of a capitalistic society.

In the end, if the goal is to keep South Broad looking like South Broad currently looks, then go ahead and set the bar higher and higher for a developer by making it more and more expensive to build there. Make sure that there is no possible way the developer can make a return commensurate with the risk, time, money and effort that it takes to develop a project.

There is always another possibility; perhaps those that want to put Kumbaya South on the property can pool their money, go to the property owner and purchase the property. Then they can build their Shangri-La development complete with employees making  $100,000 a year, free housing and a grocery store with nonfat, skinny, soy lattes that only serves people in yellow vests. Hmm…but then there’s that pesky formula that says “revenue must exceed cost of goods sold..”  But that’s likely too bourgeoisie to consider.

Arch Willingham



The Urban Legend Of Senior Tax Relief

Do The Math

Roy Exum: Casada Is Embarrassing


For those who tout the generosity of the senior property tax relief program that's already in place locally, do the rest of us a big favor: Spell out all of the requirements, restrictions, difficulties, ... (click for more)

Short and simple, do the math. Hamilton County Schools enrollment - approximately 45,000 students. Hamilton County private school enrollment - approximately 15,000. Home School students ... (click for more)

Just minutes before Saturday night’s Statesman’s Dinner in Nashville, Goernor Bill Lee sent a message to the citizens of Tennessee that our elected “statesmen” are about a pound shy of being ... (click for more)


Opinion

The Urban Legend Of Senior Tax Relief

For those who tout the generosity of the senior property tax relief program that's already in place locally, do the rest of us a big favor: Spell out all of the requirements, restrictions, difficulties, benefits and beneficiaries associated with the existing program. Tell us everything that a person has to do to get senior tax relief, and tell us how much relief they can expect. ... (click for more)

Do The Math

Short and simple, do the math. Hamilton County Schools enrollment - approximately 45,000 students. Hamilton County private school enrollment - approximately 15,000. Home School students - ? This is proof that the HCDE cannot manage a budget. Having the tax money for an extra 15,000 students on a yearly basis and not having to spend it on them looks like it should cover ... (click for more)

Breaking News

Police Charge Jason Ansley In Wreck On Main Street In Which 9-Year-Old Boy Was Killed; Going 62 MPH In 35 MPH Zone

Chattanooga Police have arrested 38-year-old Jason Ansley in a June 7 wreck on Main Street in which 9-year-old Liam Haddock was killed and two other family members injured. Police said it was determined that Ansley was traveling 62 mph in a 35 mph zone and he was caught on video running a red light at S. Orchard Knob just prior to the 9:08 p.m. crash. Police said Ansley, who ... (click for more)

Smedley, Bankston Say They Are No Votes On Property Tax Increase

Two County Commission members on Monday told members of the Pachyderm Club that they are no votes on a property tax increase. Sabrena Smedley, who currently chairs the commission, said there are a number of unanswered questions about the school system, including how the latest test scores will turn out and how much in repairs the schools will face under a new study. She said ... (click for more)

Sports

Red Bank Dunks Cleveland For First Swim Win

It’s been a challenging summer so far for the Red Bank Gators swim team, but they had extra reason to celebrate Monday night after beating the Cleveland Aqua Tigers for their first win of the season. Both teams entered Monday’s competition winless in three meets, but the Gators now have a slash in the win column after recording a convincing victory by a final score of 402-262. ... (click for more)

CASL: Monday's High-Point Scorers:

CLEVELAND HIGH-POINT SCORERS: 18 – Trey Parris III, Monroe Chittum 17 – Breanna Belcher, Charlie Chittum 16 – Lauren Thompson 15 – Elijah Sluss 13 – Luke Hunt 12 – Norah Holt 11 – Abby Anglin 10 – M.J. Miller, Eva Christmann, Estella Clemons, Ivy Briggs. RED BANK HIGH-POINT SCORERS: 19 – Noah Blake, Ben Meagher 17 – Trevor Brooks 15 – Simon Bastnagel ... (click for more)