Supreme Court Reviews Child Custody Case

And Appellate Court's Immediate Issuance Of Mandate

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

In a case involving the custody of two minor children, the Tennessee Supreme Court determined that father had established that a material change of circumstances had occurred and that it was in the children’s best interests for father to be designated as the primary residential parent.  The Court also reviewed the Court of Appeals’ immediate issuance of the mandate and its order for custody to be transferred from father to mother within 20 days.  

Father, C.W.H., and mother, L.A.S., began a dating relationship in 2008 but never married.  They had two children together before their relationship deteriorated in 2010.  In 2011, mother decided to relocate to Ohio to pursue an advanced degree; thus, the parties entered into an agreed parenting plan to accommodate the distance.  The parenting plan designated mother as primary residential parent and provided father with visitation.  

After having difficulties exercising his parenting time, father filed a petition in 2012 to modify the 2011 parenting plan.  The parties reached a new agreement in February 2013.  

Shortly thereafter, mother’s sister contacted father and informed him that mother actually resided in Nevada with the minor children and that she was employed at the Moonlight Bunny Ranch.  Father had believed that ,other resided in Ohio and worked as an independent contractor.  Father researched the internet and confirmed these assertions when he found sexually explicit photographs and videos of mother advertising her services in Nevada.  He filed a motion for an emergency temporary custody order and temporary restraining order on March 12, 2013.  The magistrate found that a material change in circumstances had occurred and that it was in the children’s best interests for father to be designated as the primary residential parent.  Mother requested a hearing before the juvenile court. 

In the juvenile court hearing, the court heard testimony concerning ,other’s employment at the Moonlight Bunny Ranch and testimony relative to the issue of each parent’s hostility toward the other.  The juvenile court relied upon mother’s employment as well as her hostility toward father in finding a material change in circumstances.  The juvenile court ordered that father be designated as the primary residential parent. 

Mother appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals.  The court remanded the case for the juvenile court to conduct a best interest analysis, which it had not done.  After conducting this analysis, the juvenile court concluded that it was in the children’s best interests for father to be the primary residential parent. 

Mother again appealed.  The Court of Appeals reversed the juvenile court’s finding of a material change in circumstances based upon mother’s employment at the Moonlight Bunny Ranch, but because mother had not preserved the finding of her hostility toward father as a material change, the Court of Appeals affirmed that finding.  The Court of Appeals reversed the juvenile court’s conclusion that the best interests of the children favored father as the primary residential parent.  In doing so, it ordered immediate issuance of the mandate and transfer of custody of the children from father to mother within 20 days.  

The Supreme Court reiterated its prior holdings that appellate courts should exercise limited review of a trial court’s factual determinations in matters involving child custody and parenting plan developments.  The Court concluded that the Court of Appeals usurped the role of the juvenile court by declining to extend deference to the juvenile court’s findings.  Applying the appropriate limited scope of review, the Supreme Court held that the juvenile court properly considered the appropriate statutory factors governing the best interest analysis and that the evidence did not preponderate against the juvenile court’s findings in this regard.  

The Supreme Court also expressed disagreement with the Court of Appeals’ issuing the mandate immediately, rather than allowing the 64 days to pass according to Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.  Although such issuance is expressly allowed by the rule, the Court cautioned against this exercise of authority in child custody cases absent a reasonable belief that a child would be in danger if the parent awarded custody by the trial court retained custody in the interim because such a chain of events would likely be harmful to the welfare of the child.  In this case, there were no allegations of either potential or immediate danger to the children if they had remained in father’s custody.  

To read the unanimous opinion in C.W.H. v. L.A.S. authored by Justice Roger A. Page, go to the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.



Enrollment Period Announced For Monthly Payment Program For Bradley County Property Taxes

Bradley County Trustee Mike Smith has announced the enrollment periods for the 12-month payment program for property taxes. The program for the 2019 property taxes will have the first payment due on March 15, 2019. Enrollment for the monthly payment program is currently open through Dec 7. An additional enrollment period will be from Jan. 3, 2019, through Feb. 8, 2019. ... (click for more)

Tennessee September Revenues Exceeded Budgeted Estimates

Tennessee revenues exceeded budgeted estimates for September. Finance and Administration Commissioner Larry Martin Thursday reported that overall September revenues were $1.4 billion, which is $63.4 million more than September of last year and $53.3 million more than the budgeted estimate. The growth rate for September was 4.66 percent. "September sales tax receipts continue ... (click for more)

Charles Pipkens, Lajeromeney Brown Arrested In Series Of Violent Home Invasions In Which Robbers Posed As Police

Chattanooga Police have arrested Charles Dijon Pipkens and Lajeromeney Brown in connection with a series of violent home invasions in which the suspects told their victims they were Chattanooga Police officers.. Pipkens, 27, was charged in an Aug. 11 case and Brown, 40, in an incident on Sept. 19. Pipkens, of 434 N. Hickory St., is charged with two counts of aggravated kidnapping, ... (click for more)

Fairyland PTO Says It Can't Get Help From Walker County Schools And Board For Cafeteria Woes

Officials of the Fairyland Elementary School PTO said in recent months, the Fairyland Elementary School cafeteria "has effectively been shut down due to equipment (which broke in June) and consequent staffing issues." The group said, "As it stands now, all food is 'satellited' in from Ridgeland High School to Fairyland Elementary School for all meals including breakfast, lunch ... (click for more)

Drink Up, Chattanooga

I attended the meeting to discuss the placement of the sewage treatment plant at the Cambridge Center in Ooltewah today. My problem with the meeting (aka) dog and pony show, is that the meeting started out with the agenda of the Ooltewah Community Council.  After living in this area for 45+ years I have never heard of this group.  I would like for someone to answer ... (click for more)

Roy Exum: The Saturday Funnies

The reviews are good after we initiated “The Funny Video of the Week” but today let me take the liberty of sharing an oldie that I consider the funniest of all time. Please be aware the principals are speaking Polish, which you also need to know makes not a bit of difference. I have watched “The Polish Spoon Trick” at least 50 times because every time I watch the video it makes ... (click for more)