State High Court Clarifies Law On Wrongful Death Lawsuits Filed By Parents Who Owe Child Support

Wednesday, December 27, 2017
In a case filed in Monroe County, the Tennessee Supreme Court clarified when Tennessee laws prevent a person who owes child support from receiving money damages from a wrongful death lawsuit. Those laws apply, the Court said, only when the person is a parent of the child who died, and the back child support is owed for that child.


In Spires v.

Simpson, a married couple, Charity Felicia Spires and Kenneth M. Spires, had a son named Uriah, born in the spring of 2009. Within a month after Uriah was born, Mr. Spires abandoned his wife and child. They never divorced, but Mr. Spires never gave his wife any financial support for Uriah.


In October 2010, when Uriah was about 18 months old, Mrs. Spires died in a tragic car accident involving 17-year-old Haley Reece Simpson. After the accident, a court gave custody of Uriah to his maternal grandmother.


About a month later, Mr. Spires filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Monroe County against Ms. Simpson and her parents. The lawsuit claimed that their negligence resulted in the death of Mrs. Spires, and asked the trial court to award money damages to Mr. Spires, for himself and on behalf of Uriah. The grandmother with custody of Uriah asked the court to allow her to intervene, that is, become a party to the lawsuit.


In the meantime, Mrs. Spires’ brother, Major Dana Trent Hensley, adopted Uriah. After that, Mr. Hensley also asked the trial court to let him intervene in the wrongful death case. Later, Ms. Simpson’s insurance carrier paid her policy limits, $100,000, into court as a settlement in the wrongful death lawsuit for Mrs. Spires’ death.


Both the grandmother and Major Hensley argued to the trial court that Mr. Spires should not be allowed to prosecute the wrongful death lawsuit or receive any of the money damages from it. They pointed to two Tennessee laws and argued that those statutes said a parent who owes child support cannot receive damages from a wrongful death lawsuit. Mr. Spires was never under a child support order for Uriah, because he and Mrs. Spires never divorced, but Mr. Spires owed almost $72,000 in back child support for four other children unrelated to Mrs. Spires.


The trial court agreed with the grandmother and Major Hensley. It dismissed Mr. Spires from the case and held that he could not receive any of the $100,000 settlement. The trial court said the Tennessee statutes disqualified Mr. Spires because he never paid any support for Uriah and because he owed substantial child support “for his other children with other women.” Mr. Spires appealed to the Court of Appeals.


The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court in part. It held that the statutes did not prevent Mr. Spires from prosecuting the wrongful death lawsuit. However, it held that the statutes required that Mr. Spires’ portion of the settlement proceeds had to be paid toward his back child support obligation for his children other than Uriah. The Tennessee Supreme Court then granted Mr. Spires permission to appeal.


The Tennessee Supreme Court disagreed with the trial court and also disagreed in part with the Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court looked carefully at all of the wrongful death statutes, not just the two statutes pointed out by Uriah’s grandmother and Major Hensley. It even reviewed the discussion of the statutes by lawmakers when the legislature enacted the laws in 1994.


The Court observed that, in enacting the statutes, lawmakers intended the laws to apply to situations where a child has died, the parents are separated or divorced, and one parent owes the other parent child support for the deceased child. In that circumstance, the legislature intended to bar the parent who owed child support from benefitting financially from the wrongful death of the child he or she failed to support. That was the only purpose of the statutes.


The laws were not intended to apply to the situation in this case, the Court held, where a wrongful death lawsuit is filed by the surviving spouse of the deceased, and the surviving spouse happens to owe back child support for children not related in any way to the deceased spouse. They were not intended to require payment of wrongful death damages to children completely unrelated to the deceased person.


For this reason, the Court reversed the trial court and reversed part of the Court of Appeals’ ruling. It held that Mr. Spires was not disqualified from filing the wrongful death lawsuit for the death of Mrs. Spires, and he could also share in the settlement proceeds from the lawsuit. It also observed, however, that the guardians of the other children for whom Mr. Spires owed child support could use any other remedies to assert claims against Mr. Spires’ share of the settlement money.      


To read the unanimous opinion in Kenneth M. Spires et al. v. Haley Reece Simpson et al., authored by Justice Holly Kirby, go to the Opinions section of

6 Gearhiser, Peters, Elliott & Cannon, PLLC Attorneys Named To 2019 Best Lawyers List

Gearhiser, Peters, Elliott & Cannon, PLLC announced that six lawyers  have been included in the 2019 Edition of  The Best Lawyers in America . Since it was first published in 1983,  Best Lawyers  has become universally regarded as the definitive guide to legal excellence.   Best Lawyers has published their list for over three decades, earning ... (click for more)

21 Chambliss Attorneys Selected For Best Lawyers In America 2019

Best Lawyers  selected William P. Aiken as the 2019 "Lawyer of the Year" for Health Care Law. Listed in  Best Lawyers in America  since 1993, Aiken concentrates his practice in health care, commercial contracts and business transactions, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate and securities law. He serves as the firm's chair for mergers and acquisitions and is a ... (click for more)

Trustee Hullander Says Airbnb Will Remit Hotel/Motel Tax Directly To His Office; It Has 600 Local Hosts With $7 Million Annual Income

Trustee Bill Hullander said Wednesday that Airbnb has agreed to directly remit hotel/motel tax for its 600 hosts in Hamilton County to his office. Mr. Hullander said prior to the agreement that his office had difficulty locating those renting out rooms or homes and had just 90 on the books. The agreement is slated to boost the current hotel/motel income from $85,000 to $560,000. ... (click for more)

County Attorney Says All Votes Were Counted In Recent Election Snafu, And None Affected Outcomes Of Races

County Attorney Rheubin Taylor, who is also the lawyer for the Election Commission, said all ballots were counted despite a recent election snafu. He said the affected voters did not affect the outcome of any election. Election officials said they learned just prior to the Aug. 2 election that there was a problem with  some district lines being improperly drawn several ... (click for more)

Jeff Styles, I Believe You - And Response (2)

I am glad that Jeff Styles presented the details of the event on his website.  Just because the government alleges a crime does not mean guilty. A criminal charge is an allegation by government. Sure, that allegation can be very serious, but the charge is still an unproven allegation until a court of law and Lady Justice has her review of the proof.  A person gets ... (click for more)

Roy Exum: ‘The Cake Is Baked’

If all goes well, and as expected, Hamilton County Chancellor Jeff Atherton will tell a group representing the Democratic Party not to ever again clutter his office or his courtroom with such a childish amount of political poppycock as will be brought on display tomorrow. The Democrats want to block Robin Smith, a longtime Republican stalwart, from becoming our next State Representative ... (click for more)