Appeals Court Upholds Ruling That Cleveland Does Not Have To Share Liquor-By-The-Drink Sales Tax Proceeds With Bradley County

  • Wednesday, December 27, 2017

The Tennessee Court of Appeals has upheld at ruling that the city of Cleveland does not have to share liquor-by-the-drink sales tax proceeds with Bradley County.

The Appeals Court said, "This is one of four separate actions currently before this Court with the common issue of whether the version of Tennessee Code Annotated § 57-4-306(a)(2)(A) in effect prior to the July 2014 amendment of that statute required a municipality governed by its own liquor-by-the-drink referendum and operating its own school system to share one-half of its liquor-by-the-drink tax revenue with the county in which the municipality was located when the county had not enacted a liquor-by-the-drink referendum.

"The county commenced the instant action by filing a complaint requesting declaratory judgment of its asserted right to a portion of liquor-by-the-drink tax revenue collected within the municipality. Upon subsequent competing motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the municipality, finding that the municipality was entitled to keep all liquor-by-the-drink tax monies distributed to it by the Tennessee Commissioner of Revenue.

"Upon the county’s motion to alter or amend, the trial court reserved judgment on the issue of whether the municipality was entitled to the local political subdivision’s portion of the liquor-by-the-drink tax revenue for sales that took place at private clubs within the municipal limits of the municipality prior to the municipality’s 2002 passage of its referendum authorizing liquor-by-the-drink sales. Following consideration of a motion for summary judgment on this remaining issue filed by the municipality and a response filed by the county, the trial court again granted summary judgment in favor of the municipality, dismissing the county’s complaint in its entirety.

"The county has appealed. Determining that the municipality was not required under the applicable version of the statute to share its liquor-by-the-drink tax revenues with the county, we affirm the trial court’s judgment."

Chancellor Jeri S. Bryant in July 2015 rulined that the city of Cleveland is entitled to keep all funds collected since city voters approved “liquor by the drink” in the Nov. 5, 2002 election. Bradley County Schools sued the city for taxes owed based on the school board’s interpretation of state law.

The city of Cleveland distributed the liquor by the drink tax to Cleveland City Schools.  

Chancellor Bryant stated in her ruling that the tax receipts were to be paid “to the local political subdivision, which has passed the referendum, thereby allowing the city to keep all the funds raised by this tax.”

A similar referendum was defeated by Bradley County voters to allow “liquor by the drink.” She acknowledged that the city has operated its own kindergarten through 12th grade school system separate from Bradley County Schools and that the Tennessee Department of Revenue paid distributed funds to the city from the tax codified in Tennessee Code Annotated 57-4-301.

Chancellor Bryant wrote in the five-page order that both parties agreed on the facts, but it was the interpretation of Tennessee Code Annotated 57-4-301 that was disputed.

The city and county agreed that the first 50 percent of the tax went to the general fund of the state pursuant to state codes. The other half were to be "expended and distributed in the same manner as the county property tax for schools is expended and distributed," in this case, to the city or town where the tax is collected.

The city took the position that TCA §57-4-301 did not apply to the county because the county never authorized liquor by the drink. She said, "TCA §57-4-103(a)(l) states in part, "… (t)his chapter shall be effective in any jurisdiction which authorizes the sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption on the premises in a referendum ... . This court agrees that the county defeated the referendum and, therefore, has neither rights nor responsibilities under TCA §57-4-101. It is therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby granted. The city is entitled to keep all funds collected pursuant to TCA §57-4-301.”

The county argued that a 2014 amendment declared the legislature's original intent was to require the municipality to distribute consumption tax proceeds to the county in which the municipality lies, regardless of whether the municipality operates its own school system.

 “This court disagrees,” the chancellor wrote. “The 2014 Amendment to TCA §57-4-306 rewrote 306(a)(2) and provided a one-year timeframe that allowed the county to share in the collection of the taxes based on the average daily attendance of the students in the city system with the remaining amount to be distributed to the county trustee for the county school system. After July I, 2015, the proceeds pursuant to 306(a)(2) reverted back to the old language. The court finds this is an indication that the original language was intended to only allow funds to be paid to the local political subdivision which has passed the referendum thereby allowing the City to keep all funds raised by this tax.”

The Bradley County Board of Education and Bradley County versus the City of Cleveland was heard March 2, 2015, in Chancery Court for Bradley County. Cleveland Attorney James F. Logan represented the county and Douglas S. Johnston Jr., Nashville, represented the city.

This was the second dispute over tax distributions between the city and county in recent years. Bradley County Schools was ordered in November 2012 by the Appeals Court to repay $1.422 million to the city. That legal entanglement began after Cleveland voters approved increasing the city sales tax rate by .5 percent on March 10, 2009.

Breaking News
New Hope Fire Department Disputes TWRA Report On Kayaker Rescues
  • 3/28/2024

New Hope Fire Department Corey Comstock disputed a report by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency about the rescue of 33 kayakers from extremely high winds near Nickajack Cave on Monday. ... more

Woman Dies After Being Seriously Injured In House Fire Thursday Afternoon
Woman Dies After Being Seriously Injured In House Fire Thursday Afternoon
  • 3/28/2024

A woman died after sustaining life-threatening injuries in a house fire on North Moore Road Thursday afternoon and was rescued by Chattanooga firefighters. Hamilton County 911 received a call ... more

Motorcyclist Hit Speeds Of 170 MPH; Posted Video Of Outrunning Police
Motorcyclist Hit Speeds Of 170 MPH; Posted Video Of Outrunning Police
  • 3/28/2024

A motorcyclist fled on Sunday, from a Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office deputy attempting to make a lawful stop on Highway 27. Since that time, the deputy has been working leads to identify the ... more