Out Of Control Agency

Saturday, September 2, 2017

I own a small inflatable rental company and January of this year while out of town I was contacted by Mike Hardy of the Amusement device division informing me the state now considered inflatables as meeting the definition of an amusement device and that he was hired to level the playing field.

He told me I was not in compliance with the following TN Code 68-121-101 (3) (A)  “Amusement Device” means: Any mechanical or structural device that carries or conveys a person, or that permits a person to walk along, around or over a fixed or restricted route or course or within a defined area, including the entrances and exits to the device, for the purpose of giving persons amusement, pleasure, thrills or excitement.

I initially told him the code did not apply to inflatables and I would not comply but before hanging up I told him I would take a look at it when I returned home. After looking at it I emailed him two questions. Was an inflatable a mechanical or structural device and if the state defined these two terms. After consulting Kevin Klutts, Carlene T. Bennett and Kim J. Jefferson he simply restated his position in an email: “Inflatables devices fall under the definition of Amusement devices (Yes, I know, he told me that on the phone.I wanted clarification). Extensive research by the unit, consultation with other government agencies, and discussions with the department’s attorney are consistent with the programs interpretation. Unless we are instructed to change our current policy, we must proceed accordingly.” (Even though we can't determine what type of device it is we have made our decision to continue to enforce our interpretation) 

The agency charged with enforcing this section of the code did not and could not answer the core question that needed to be answered to determine if inflatables met the definition of an amusement device. Finally three week after asking my question to Mr. Hardy Kim Jefferson told me in an email the state considered inflatables a structural device. 

First of all, if you are in the private sector would your boss give you three weeks to answer a clients simple question that you should have known before you made the call? Even after extensive research, meeting with the department’s attorneys and other governmental agencies they still couldn’t say whether an inflatable was a mechanical or structural device. Then why was this agency making phone calls? So naturally I requested all the information related to this review and extensive research thru a FOIA request, which I have not received as of today.

At this point from what I can tell from the non-compliant list on their website they had been calling inflatable business owners since May 2015 citing and enforcing the above code. So, they had at least 18 months before calling me to fully understand what they were trying to enforce and yet they did not have a clue. 

The state did respond to my previous FOIA request concerning complaints and injuries with inflatables from 2015 to April 2017. There have been no reported complaints or injuries to the state related to inflatables in this time period. There were a total of 22 injuries reported during this time most at trampoline parks and the others at amusement parks. Out of the 22 one was operator error and one was mechanical all the others could be contributed to the user.

There is one type of complaint the state is receiving. According to some of the companies I have talked to inflatable companies who have complied are reporting other companies who are not in compliance and you can't blame them but it does sound a little like Cuba. 

I do want to point out two separate pieces of legislation to include and exclude inflatables in the code has failed to pass. 

I point all this out to show how easy it is for any government agency to expand their scope and reach without any legislation.  All they have to do is take current code, ignore the intent of the code, reinterpret the code, get a verbal okay from the state attorney general or others and then its David(individual) vs.Goliath (state).

Just for the record since I did not want to go to jail or be fined I did reluctantly comply. Others chose to shut down their business. Some companies will believe this to be a great idea (I haven't talked to any that do and I have talked to a number) partly because they recognize the state has constructed a barrier to entry that some will not want to cross and it will drive some out as we have already seen.

Some will say this is for the safety of the children, not so. Even Mr. Hardy in his initial conversation with me didn’t mention safety only leveling the playing field. The inspection and permitting process adds nothing to the safety of the inflatables as almost all injuries related to any type of device is most likely due to the user as shown by the reports filed with the state.   The cited code the state is enforcing does not apply to inflatables and the state is not experiencing a health and safety issue (which is the reason they most likely use to pass any regulation) with inflatables and has no business regulating them.

Mike Lynn 
Cleveland


Roy Exum: The Saturday Funnies

It is said that a 15-year-old in Minnesota, where just like the rest of the United States prayer in schools is prohibited, was tasked with writing an essay. He turned in his paper and, as it was returned with an A-plus, it is only fitting that something this clever should begin this week’s edition of The  Saturday  Funnies. Those who enjoy the Funnies understand that ... (click for more)

Protect The Dreamers - And Response

Children of illegal immigrants brought here as juveniles should be able to stay here.  When these children were brought to the U.S. they did not, willingly with any intent, violate immigration laws. They were too young to even know what immigration laws were. For many, this is the only home they have ever known. Now, as educated and otherwise law abiding young adults, it ... (click for more)

Fleischmann Blames Senate Democrats For Government Shutdown

Congressman Chuck Fleischmann blamed Senate Democrats after the Senate’s failure to pass the Continuing Resolution (CR), putting a government shutdown into place. He said,  “I cannot fathom how Senate Democrats, knowing the severity of the issues in question, acted with such insensitivity using our children and our military as pawns, putting party over country. ... (click for more)

From Green Window Shutters To Forks And Spoons, Mount Vernon Restaurant Up For Auction

From the green wooden window shutters to the forks, knives and spoons, the landmark Mount Vernon Restaurant is up for auction. Marc Gravitt, of Gravitt Auction, said there will be an online auction starting Thursday morning and running through Saturday at noon. It will be handled as a "staggered close," he said. The first item will go first, then the second 30 seconds later, ... (click for more)

Lady Vols Looking For Answers as No. 3 Mississippi State Up Next

With No. 3 ranked and undefeated Mississippi State (19-0, 5-0) gliding into Knoxville on the heels of a crushing 23 point comeback 84-70 loss to No. 5/5 Notre Dame at South Bend, head coach Holly Warlick and the No. 6/7 Lady Vols (16-2, 4-1) are looking for some answers – fast.   The game will be broadcast on ESPN2 with a 3 p.m. tip-off from Thompson-Boling Arena in Knoxville. ... (click for more)

Furman Top Mocs 58-57 In SoCon Hoops

The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga fell 58-57 at Furman Saturday afternoon in a game that came down to the wire. The Mocs fall to 12-7 on the year and 3-2 in Southern Conference women's basketball action and the Paladins move to 12-8 overall and 3-2 line league play.   Senior Keiana Gilbert and sophomore Lakelyn Bouldin combined for 40 of the Mocs 57 points with ... (click for more)