Tennessee Supreme Court Answers Question From Federal Court On Collection Of Airplane Repair Bill

Tuesday, November 28, 2017
The Tennessee Supreme Court addressed a certified question from a federal district court on an aircraft maintenance company’s effort to collect its bill for work done on a commercial airplane.
AeroCentury Corporation owned a commercial airplane, which it leased to a regional airline, Colgan Air, Inc. Near the end of the lease, Colgan took the airplane to a Nashville-based company, Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Services, Inc., for inspection, maintenance, and repairs. Embraer completed the work, and its bill was approximately $350,000.
Under Tennessee law, Embraer acquired a legal claim called a “repairman’s lien” on the airplane. The lien meant that, if Embraer’s bill was not paid, Embraer had the right to take possession of the airplane and sell it to collect its bill.
Colgan never paid Embraer. Less than three months after Embraer’s work was complete, Colgan filed for bankruptcy. Colgan’s bankruptcy filing meant that Colgan was unable to pay Embraer for the work done on the airplane.
With no practical way to get payment from its debtor Colgan, Embraer filed a lawsuit against AeroCentury in Tennessee federal district court. The lawsuit asked the federal court to enforce Embraer’s repairman’s lien against the airplane, in other words, to order the airplane sold in order to pay Embraer’s bill. 
After the federal lawsuit was filed, unbeknownst to Embraer, AeroCentury sold the airplane to a company located in the Ukraine. This put the airplane out of Embraer’s reach; Embraer could not get possession of the airplane in order to sell it to pay off the debt. Frustrated, Embraer asked the federal court to order AeroCentury to pay the proceeds from its sale of the airplane into court so they could be applied to Embraer’s bill.  
After receiving Embraer’s request, the federal district court was unclear on a point of Tennessee law. Under Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 23, the federal district court sent the Tennessee Supreme Court a “certified” question, that is, it asked the Court to answer a question on Tennessee law without taking the entire case. This can be done when there are no Tennessee cases to guide the federal court in applying Tennessee law. 
The federal district court asked whether a repairman’s lien under the statute can be enforced by a method other than allowing the creditor to take possession of the property and sell it to pay the debt. Specifically, it asked whether Embraer’s lien would follow the proceeds of AeroCentury’s sale of the airplane.
The Supreme Court looked at the plain language of the statute and held that it only allows creditors to enforce a repairman’s lien by sale of the lien-subject property—here, the airplane. The statute does not say how a creditor might reach the proceeds from the sale of lien-subject property. Consequently, the particular Tennessee statute the federal court asked about does not authorize Embraer to reach the proceeds of AeroCentury’s sale of the airplane.  
The federal district court certified a second question about other remedies for a creditor when the owner has made it impractical to take possession of a lien-subject property. Under Rule 23, this certified question was not answered because there are adequate Tennessee cases to guide the parties and the federal court on the issue.      
To read the unanimous opinion in Embraer Aircraft Maintenance Services, Inc. v. AeroCentury Corporation, authored by Justice Holly Kirby, go to the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.

Rembrandt Conservator Works To Restore Historic TVA Mural

An art conservator who can count a  Rembrandt painting  among his many restoration projects is now working to save a mural at Norris Dam. The severely damaged artwork was discovered behind a dated gold-colored shag rug bolted to the powerhouse lobby wall during preparations for the plant’s 80 th  anniversary celebration in 2016. The mural—painted by TVA artist ... (click for more)

Tennessee Supreme Court Affirms Mother's Convictions For 1st-Degreee Murder And Aggravated Child Abuse Of Newborn Twins

In a unanimous opinion, the Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed the convictions of Lindsey Lowe for first-degree murder and aggravated child abuse, stemming from the deaths of her newborn twins caused by her smothering the infants shortly after birth.  Prior to trial, Ms. Lowe moved to suppress evidence obtained under a search warrant, based on the fact that one of the three ... (click for more)

Kordarrius Murphy, 22, Shot On Bonny Oaks Drive Late Thursday Night

Kordarrius Murphy, 22, was shot late Thursday night on Bonny Oaks Drive.   The Chattanooga Police Department responded  at approximately  11:36 p.m.   to a report that a person had been shot. Officers were dispatched to a vehicle crash with injuries at 4200 Bonny Oaks Drive. At the same time, a shooting victim arrived at a local hospital in a private ... (click for more)

Chancellor Fleenor Sets Aug. 6 Hearing In Democratic Suit To Keep Robin Smith Off The Ballot; Ms. Smith Was Former Campaign Advisor To Judge

Hamilton County Chancellor Pam McNutt Fleenor has set a hearing for Aug. 6 at 1:30 p.m. on a lawsuit brought by the Tennessee Democratic Party seeking to keep former state GOP Chairman Robin Smith off the ballot. Ms. Smith was a campaign advisor for Ms. McNutt Fleenor when she ran for judge in 2014. Her Rivers Edge Alliance was paid $13,546.86 by the McNutt Fleenor campaign, ... (click for more)

Not My University: Why I’m Not Okay With Mike Pence Coming To Lee University - And Response (6)

As a student of Lee University, who is well-aware of the Lee administration’s more conservative stance in politics, I am upset about Mike Pence visiting the university and being welcomed on our campus. Although I respect that Pence is in a position of authority as our nation’s Vice President, and that he likewise deserves the right to hold his own opinions in regards to the issues ... (click for more)

Employee Who Stole From East Ridge Should Be Prosecuted

Why has the East Ridge employee who was fired for theft not been charged with theft?    City Manager Scott Miller made the statement that the employee had problems and that the stolen items were returned.  What does that have to do with the employee stealing ?   He has had a history of abuse of city resources. Why is he not being prosecuted? ... (click for more)