Supreme Court Affirms Death Row Inmate’s Murder Conviction But Orders Another Sentencing Hearing

  • Tuesday, November 18, 2014

The Tennessee Supreme Court has upheld a death row inmate’s conviction for first-degree murder. However, it has ordered a new sentencing hearing because the lawyers representing the man at trial did not properly represent him.

Jerry Ray Davidson was convicted of the 1995 murder of Virginia Jackson in Dickson. At the time of his trial, his defense attorneys possessed numerous records documenting Davidson’s troubled background and long history of mental illness.

During the sentencing hearing following Davidson’s conviction for first degree murder, his lawyers failed to provide the jury with any evidence about Davidson’s history of psychiatric problems. Accordingly, the jury sentenced Davidson to death without knowing about his diminished mental functioning.

In this challenge to his conviction and sentence, Davidson argued that the lawyers who represented him at trial violated his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel by failing to inform the jury of his physical brain abnormalities, cognitive deficiencies, and psychoses. In addressing these claims, the Supreme Court agreed that defense attorneys in death penalty cases have a constitutional duty to collect and present to the jury any “mitigation evidence” that could help the jury assess the defendant’s moral culpability.

The Supreme Court held that the attorneys’ failure to provide the jury with any information concerning Davidson’s brain abnormalities and cognitive and psychological problems deprived Mr. Davidson of his constitutional right to effective representation. Although the Court upheld his convictions for first degree premeditated murder and aggravated kidnapping, the Court remanded his case to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing.

In a separate opinion, Justice Gary R. Wade concurred with the Court’s conclusion that Davidson was entitled to a new sentencing hearing. However, Justice Wade also decided that Davidson’s attorneys had not effectively represented him during the guilt phase of the trial and, therefore, that Davidson was also entitled to a new trial on his guilt or innocence.

To read the majority opinion in Jerry Ray Davidson v. State of Tennessee, authored by Justice William C. Koch, Jr., and the separate opinion by Justice Wade, visit the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.

Business/Government
Chattanooga Chamber Calendar Of Events May 6-10
  • 5/2/2024

May 7, Member Orientation 8:30-9:30 a.m. Chattanooga Chamber of Commerce: 811 Broad St., Ste. 100 Please join our team to learn more about Chamber Membership. This is an in-person informational ... more

The Dixie Group Reports Net Sales Down During First Quarter
  • 5/2/2024

The Dixie Group, Inc. on Thursday reported financial results for the quarter ended March 30. Net sales in the first quarter of 2024 were $65.3 million compared to $67.1million in the same ... more

Latest Bradley County Arrest Report
  • 5/2/2024

Click here for the latest Bradley County arrest report. more