State Supreme Court Holds That Evidence Cannot Be Used To Contradict Written Words In Contract

Friday, January 18, 2019

In a case closely watched by Tennessee’s business community, the Tennessee Supreme Court has held that trial courts cannot use evidence outside of the written agreement—called “extrinsic” evidence—to interpret a contract if that evidence is used to contradict the contract’s written terms.

Beginning in 1999, BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., signed agency agreements with insurance agency Individual HealthCare Specialists, Inc., to allow Individual HealthCare to solicit applications for BlueCross insurance policies.  Their business relationship lasted over ten years, with new contracts each year that spelled out the commission rates for sales of new insurance policies and renewals of existing insurance policies.

For years, BlueCross paid Individual HealthCare commissions on renewal policies at the renewal rate in effect when the policy was first issued.  In 2011, however, BlueCross began paying commissions on renewal policies based on the rate in effect when the policy was renewed, which was substantially less.  Individual HealthCare objected, claiming that this was a retroactive change in renewal commission rates and that BlueCross could not change those rates without Individual HealthCare’s permission.  Ultimately, the parties’ business relationship ended.

Individual HealthCare sued BlueCross in Davidson County Chancery Court for breach of contract. The parties disputed, among other things, whether BlueCross had the authority to unilaterally change commission rates on renewal policies.      

At the trial level, in addition to reviewing the written language of the contract, the trial court also considered the oral testimony of former BlueCross executives who participated in negotiating the agency contract.  The executives testified that during the pre-contract negotiations neither party intended for BlueCross to have the authority to unilaterally change the commission rate for renewal policies retroactively. This oral testimony contradicted the written contract.

Interpreting the contract, the trial court ruled in line with the testimony of the former BlueCross executives, finding that BlueCross did not have authority to change commission rates retroactively. The Court of Appeals affirmed, and the Tennessee Supreme Court granted BlueCross permission to appeal. 

The Supreme Court commented that Tennessee judges have long used extrinsic evidence of the circumstances when parties entered into a contract to interpret what they intended the written words to mean.  However, the Court said, “the written words are the lodestar of contract interpretation.” Tennessee law does not allow the use of extrinsic evidence of pre-contract negotiations to justify an interpretation of the contract that contradicts the contract’s written words.

The Supreme Court found that the language in the contract between BlueCross and Individual HealthCare clearly gave BlueCross the right to unilaterally change all of the commission rates, including the renewal rates.  The Court concluded that the trial court erred by using evidence of the parties’ pre-contract negotiations to contradict the written words in their agreement.  Consequently, it reversed the trial court’s decision and held that BlueCross did not breach the contract by changing the applicable commission rate for renewal policies.

To read the unanimous opinion in Individual HealthCare Specialists, Inc. v. BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., authored by Justice Holly Kirby, go to the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.

 


Tennessee Supreme Court Upholds Hamilton County Court's Decision To Exclude Videotape Of Post-Polygraph Statements

AG Slatery Joins In Fight Against Illegal Robocalls

TVA Board Focuses On Strengthening Tennessee Valley Public Power


In an opinion released Wednesday, the Tennessee Supreme Court held that a trial court acted within its discretion in excluding from trial a defendant’s videotaped statements given in a post-polygraph ... (click for more)

Attorney General Herbert H. Slatery III Thursday announced that as a result of a bipartisan, public/private coalition of 51 attorneys general and 12 phone companies, the phone companies have ... (click for more)

The Tennessee Valley Authority board of directors approved a number of forward-looking actions designed to add flexibility and stability to the public power model serving more than 10 million ... (click for more)


Business

Tennessee Supreme Court Upholds Hamilton County Court's Decision To Exclude Videotape Of Post-Polygraph Statements

In an opinion released Wednesday, the Tennessee Supreme Court held that a trial court acted within its discretion in excluding from trial a defendant’s videotaped statements given in a post-polygraph interview. In so doing, the Court reversed the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The defendant, Quintis McCaleb, was indicted on one count of aggravated sexual battery ... (click for more)

AG Slatery Joins In Fight Against Illegal Robocalls

Attorney General Herbert H. Slatery III Thursday announced that as a result of a bipartisan, public/private coalition of 51 attorneys general and 12 phone companies, the phone companies have agreed to adopt eight principles to fight illegal robocalls. “Robocalls are uninvited, a breach of privacy, distracting and generally a menace,” said General Slatery. “This agreement should ... (click for more)

Breaking News

City Treasurer Set To Collect Business Improvement District Assessments After County Commission Balks

The City Treasurer is now set to collect the first-year assessments for the downtown Business Improvement District (BID) after the County Commission decided not to let Trustee Bill Hullander do it. The City Council is set to consider a resolution on Sept. 3 authorizing the treasurer to do the collections. The resolution is sponsored by Chairman Erskine Oglesby, a staunch supporter ... (click for more)

Judge Throws Out Count 1 Of RICO Cases Brought Against Athens Park Bloods

Criminal Court Judge Tom Greenholtz, in a 27-page opinion, has dismissed count 1 of an indictment brought against most of the 55 members of the Athens Park Bloods gang by the District Attorney's Office. The ruling did not affect a few of the defendants. Judge Greenholtz said, "Count I fails to allege the existence of two predicate acts occurring within two years of each other, ... (click for more)

Opinion

Are There Too Many Hamilton County Schools? - And Response

Two recent articles reveal a great deal about the present state of local public education. Mixing and matching information and reading between the lines reveals even more. First, there is that loooonnnngg list of Top Hamilton County Schools Salaries 2019. That nearly incredible list covers only salaries from $70,000 and up, and includes 290 different individuals -- approaching ... (click for more)

Roy Exum: Why We Must Read

One of the greatest scenes in all of moviedom is at that moment in the movie “Patton” where only George C. Scott could provide the harsh cackle. Starring in the role of the famed World War II general, Scott stands in the turret of his command vehicle and yells in the wind, “Rommel, you magnificent bastard … I read your book!” What too few of those who caused the 1970 film to ... (click for more)