City Council To Discuss Senior Tax Freeze Tuesday. See Our Legal Notices.

Supreme Court Opinion Intreprets Contact Renewal

  • Tuesday, November 20, 2012

In a unanimous opinion, the Tennessee Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a subsequent contract between parties that shares provisions similar to a previous contract does not necessarily constitute a renewal of the earlier agreement.

At issue in BSG, LLC v. Check Velocity, Inc. is Check Velocity’s payment of fee residuals to BSG for referring clients to Check Velocity’s check re-presentment services. The parties executed two contracts that governed business they did together from early 2004 until early 2009. During that time, BSG referred Weight Watchers to Check Velocity. Check Velocity and Weight Watchers entered into an “Electronic Check Recovery Agreement” that expired June 29, 2007 although they continued to operate under the terms of that agreement until August 2008. During that time, Check Velocity continued to pay fee residuals to BSG. 

In August 2008, Check Velocity and Weight Watchers entered into a “Collection Services Agreement” in which Check Velocity continued to provide electronic re-presentment services but under different terms and with added responsibilities. Check Velocity ceased payments to BSG after September 15, 2008.

BSG filed a complaint alleging Check Velocity’s failure to pay fee residuals on the Weight Watchers contract constituted a breach of their 2006 agreement. 

The trial court awarded summary judgment in favor of Check Velocity, which was reversed by the Court of Appeals, holding that the 2008 agreement between Weight Watchers and Check Velocity was a renewal of the previous agreement and therefore required Check Velocity to pay BSG fee residuals under the terms of their 2006 agreement.

The Supreme Court reverses the Court of Appeals and affirms the trial court, holding today that, under the terms of the contract between BSG and Check Velocity, the second agreement between Weight Watchers and Check Velocity was not a renewal of the first agreement that would require Check Velocity to pay fee residuals to BSG.

To read the BSG, LLC v. CHECK VELOCITY, INC opinion, authored by Justice Janice M. Holder, visit ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ TNCourts.gov. 


Business
INCubator Of Chattanooga Launches INC Connect To Support Early-Stage Manufacturing & Product Startups
  • 7/16/2025

The INCubator at the Hamilton County Business Development Center, a program of the Chattanooga Chamber of Commerce, announces the launch of INC Connect, a new makerspace initiative created in ... more

3686 Pitch Competition Returns
3686 Pitch Competition Returns
  • 7/15/2025

Launch Tennessee is calling for standout startups in the state to apply for its upcoming pitch competition, presented by Amazon, for a chance to win the grand prize of $10,000 cash. Tennessee-located ... more

Smith + Howard Appoints Travis Shears As Managing Partner Of Its Chattanooga Office
Smith + Howard Appoints Travis Shears As Managing Partner Of Its Chattanooga Office
  • 7/15/2025

Smith + Howard accounting and advisory firm announced today the appointment of Travis Shears, CPA, as office managing partner of its Chattanooga location, formerly Market Street Partners. ... more