State High Court Clarifies Law On Wrongful Death Lawsuits Filed By Parents Who Owe Child Support

Wednesday, December 27, 2017
In a case filed in Monroe County, the Tennessee Supreme Court clarified when Tennessee laws prevent a person who owes child support from receiving money damages from a wrongful death lawsuit. Those laws apply, the Court said, only when the person is a parent of the child who died, and the back child support is owed for that child.

 

In Spires v.

Simpson, a married couple, Charity Felicia Spires and Kenneth M. Spires, had a son named Uriah, born in the spring of 2009. Within a month after Uriah was born, Mr. Spires abandoned his wife and child. They never divorced, but Mr. Spires never gave his wife any financial support for Uriah.

 

In October 2010, when Uriah was about 18 months old, Mrs. Spires died in a tragic car accident involving 17-year-old Haley Reece Simpson. After the accident, a court gave custody of Uriah to his maternal grandmother.

 

About a month later, Mr. Spires filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Monroe County against Ms. Simpson and her parents. The lawsuit claimed that their negligence resulted in the death of Mrs. Spires, and asked the trial court to award money damages to Mr. Spires, for himself and on behalf of Uriah. The grandmother with custody of Uriah asked the court to allow her to intervene, that is, become a party to the lawsuit.

 

In the meantime, Mrs. Spires’ brother, Major Dana Trent Hensley, adopted Uriah. After that, Mr. Hensley also asked the trial court to let him intervene in the wrongful death case. Later, Ms. Simpson’s insurance carrier paid her policy limits, $100,000, into court as a settlement in the wrongful death lawsuit for Mrs. Spires’ death.

 

Both the grandmother and Major Hensley argued to the trial court that Mr. Spires should not be allowed to prosecute the wrongful death lawsuit or receive any of the money damages from it. They pointed to two Tennessee laws and argued that those statutes said a parent who owes child support cannot receive damages from a wrongful death lawsuit. Mr. Spires was never under a child support order for Uriah, because he and Mrs. Spires never divorced, but Mr. Spires owed almost $72,000 in back child support for four other children unrelated to Mrs. Spires.

 

The trial court agreed with the grandmother and Major Hensley. It dismissed Mr. Spires from the case and held that he could not receive any of the $100,000 settlement. The trial court said the Tennessee statutes disqualified Mr. Spires because he never paid any support for Uriah and because he owed substantial child support “for his other children with other women.” Mr. Spires appealed to the Court of Appeals.

 

The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court in part. It held that the statutes did not prevent Mr. Spires from prosecuting the wrongful death lawsuit. However, it held that the statutes required that Mr. Spires’ portion of the settlement proceeds had to be paid toward his back child support obligation for his children other than Uriah. The Tennessee Supreme Court then granted Mr. Spires permission to appeal.

 

The Tennessee Supreme Court disagreed with the trial court and also disagreed in part with the Court of Appeals. The Supreme Court looked carefully at all of the wrongful death statutes, not just the two statutes pointed out by Uriah’s grandmother and Major Hensley. It even reviewed the discussion of the statutes by lawmakers when the legislature enacted the laws in 1994.

 

The Court observed that, in enacting the statutes, lawmakers intended the laws to apply to situations where a child has died, the parents are separated or divorced, and one parent owes the other parent child support for the deceased child. In that circumstance, the legislature intended to bar the parent who owed child support from benefitting financially from the wrongful death of the child he or she failed to support. That was the only purpose of the statutes.

 

The laws were not intended to apply to the situation in this case, the Court held, where a wrongful death lawsuit is filed by the surviving spouse of the deceased, and the surviving spouse happens to owe back child support for children not related in any way to the deceased spouse. They were not intended to require payment of wrongful death damages to children completely unrelated to the deceased person.

 

For this reason, the Court reversed the trial court and reversed part of the Court of Appeals’ ruling. It held that Mr. Spires was not disqualified from filing the wrongful death lawsuit for the death of Mrs. Spires, and he could also share in the settlement proceeds from the lawsuit. It also observed, however, that the guardians of the other children for whom Mr. Spires owed child support could use any other remedies to assert claims against Mr. Spires’ share of the settlement money.      

 

To read the unanimous opinion in Kenneth M. Spires et al. v. Haley Reece Simpson et al., authored by Justice Holly Kirby, go to the Opinions section of TNCourts.gov.


State Supreme Court Holds That Evidence Cannot Be Used To Contradict Written Words In Contract

Public Space Study Continues With Gehl's Visit

GDOL Keeping Up With Pace Of Federal Claims From Furloughed Workers


In a case closely watched by Tennessee’s business community, the Tennessee Supreme Court has held that trial courts cannot use evidence outside of the written agreement—called “extrinsic” evidence—to ... (click for more)

Gehl Studio, internationally recognized for their "people first" urban design work, will be making their third visit to Chattanooga. On Jan. 29 from 5:30-6:30 p.m., they'll be hosting an open ... (click for more)

The national story that aired on ABC Nightly News on Wednesday does not reflect the state of Georgia’s handling of unemployment insurance claims for furloughed federal workers. The network did ... (click for more)


Business

State Supreme Court Holds That Evidence Cannot Be Used To Contradict Written Words In Contract

In a case closely watched by Tennessee’s business community, the Tennessee Supreme Court has held that trial courts cannot use evidence outside of the written agreement—called “extrinsic” evidence—to interpret a contract if that evidence is used to contradict the contract’s written terms. Beginning in 1999, BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee, Inc., signed agency agreements with ... (click for more)

Public Space Study Continues With Gehl's Visit

Gehl Studio, internationally recognized for their "people first" urban design work, will be making their third visit to Chattanooga. On Jan. 29 from 5:30-6:30 p.m., they'll be hosting an open house at The Bessie Smith Cultural Center to seek input about people's experiences in public spaces downtown. The meeting is part of larger study to improve public spaces in the District. (click for more)

Breaking News

City Council To Vote Jan. 29 On Contract To Finally Clean Up The Lupton City Mill Site

The City Council is set to vote On Jan. 29 on a long-awaited contract to clean up the Lupton Mill site. The contract with Wright Brothers of Charleston, Tn., is for $1,676,744, with a contingency of $150,000. It calls for the firm to complete the demolition of remnants of buildings remaining at the site along Mercer Street. The site will be "rubblized" and then material ... (click for more)

Askia Witherow Charged In October 2018 Murder Of Jacob Dakota Moore Of Apison

Authorities have charged Askia Witherow in the October 2018 murder of Jacob Dakota Moore of Apison. An investigation by special agents with the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, the Polk County Sheriff’s Department, the 10 th District Attorney General’s Office and the Hamilton County Sheriff’s Office resulted in the arrest of the 39-year-old Ooltewah man. At the request ... (click for more)

Opinion

Don’t Trust County Attorney Taylor’s Gag Order

At this point, most of us are aware of the WWTA debacle on site selection and the half-baked planning for a new treatment plant on Mahan Gap Road. There were also untruths given to the public about the basis or need for a new treatment plant on Mahan Gap Road by WWTA. That, my friends, is offensive. Pam Sohn of the Times Free Press outed the WWTA’s false contention ... (click for more)

Roy Exum: The Saturday Funnies

It seems there has been quite an increase in calls from telemarketers and I asked my man Cleo if he had any idea how to stop them. “What works if you are male -- Telemarketer: "Hi, my name is Judy and I'm with XYZ Company." You wait for a second and, with a real husky voice, ask, "What are you wearing?" If you are a female try this: Cry out in surprise, "Judy? Is that you? Oh my ... (click for more)