Ralph Nader was invited to speak at University of the South a few months after the election George W. Bush won over Al Gore. Mr. Nader was asked how he could reconcile the votes he took away from Mr. Gore, because they would have made Mr. Gore the winner. His response was to the point. He replied the questioner should observe Mr. Bush had more votes than Mr. Gore and the questioner should pose the question to those who voted for Mr. Bush.
So today 13 state attorneys general join in the Texas appeal to the Supreme Court to hear of four states who have narrow wins for Mr. Biden over the President. The allegation is constitutional rules were broken and some voters may have voted in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Yet the Texas appeal say nothing of the fact the same process was allowed in Texas. Nor does it note the Texas Solicitor General declines to participate. He would be the state advocate to the Supreme Court and he declined to participate. So this thin charade goes on.
Yesterday the American Bar Association weighed in on frivolous suits filed with not even thin evidence. In a letter signed by 1,500 members the following was stated, ”A license to practice law is not a license to lie to the public on behalf of a client, whether doing so endangers one individual or the entire body politic.”
Two hundred million dollars have been raised and are being spent to support the loser in an election he lost. The wealth of comedians and lawyers willing to participate has been the benefit. The body politic, that is, people on both side of the aisle who know better are the ones who wind up being the ones to shoulder the burden. Our congressman is silent, as are our senators. It is a shame they can’t replace their nerve to shame their opposition party with courage to be honest with their own party with truth to the process. Their candidate lost.
Last but not least, one of the "stolen” votes in Georgia was in Dade County. A month after it was revealed the Dade County sheriff was investigating, no resolution has been made public. So what happened?
Prentice Hicks
* * *
The shame, Mr Hicks, was when Hillary Clinton and her sycophants went on about how Russians stole the 2016 election. What was disgraceful was Adam Schiff repeatedly claiming on national TV to have evidence to prove it when he never did.
It was arrogance when Democrat Senator Harry Reid, using the protection of his speech while in the well of the Senate, claimed Mitt Romney paid no taxes. He didn’t have to worry about fact checkers or being banned from social media. He also knew the media would help him hoodwink the gullible. Did that undermine confidence in Congress? Check their approval rating.
Now as allegations of mischief go through the process we will see what has been going on in certain locations in America for decades. It will finally be brought to light on a much grander scale.
So what happened to the Democrats’ claim (NY Times, Sept 2, Oct 23; VOX, Sept 21, 2020) Russians were going to again interfere in the 2020 election? Or was the Russia, Russia thing just a charade all along?
Ralph Miller