When a trusted leader abruptly steps away, it’s never just about one resignation—it signals deeper fractures within an organization. Kathy Lennon’s unexpected departure as vice chair of the Hamilton County Democratic Party is concerning; it points to underlying issues of transparency and accountability that we've overlooked for far too long.
Having previously stepped away from active party involvement myself, I was encouraged by the renewed energy and sense of unity brought forth by Kathy Lennon and Chairwoman Nikwonn Robinson. Together, their leadership promised a fresh, inclusive, and action-oriented approach, seemingly poised to address past frustrations and rally a broader base.
Yet Lennon’s resignation now leaves an unsettling silence—one that contradicts everything we've known about her leadership style. Kathy Lennon has never been shy about voicing her concerns. She is known for openly and vigorously addressing difficult issues, leading organized community protests and advocating passionately for change. Why, then, has she now become silent on the reasons behind her sudden resignation?
I’ve personally reached out to Lennon, hoping to avoid further speculation and to get clarity directly. Unfortunately, the silence persists. Her unexpected departure compels us to ask direct and necessary questions: Would she have resigned had she been elected Chair? Was there internal discord, pressure, or unresolved conflict influencing her decision? Given troubling whispers of bullying, racial tension, and accusations of tokenism during the party's reorganization, silence is more than suspicious, it's unacceptable.
Additionally, lingering discontent from the tenure of former Chair Rachel Campbell, who has moved on to lead the state party, cannot be overlooked. Although she has been vocal about her failures, many were dissatisfied, feeling unheard, marginalized and frustrated. Has this dissatisfaction merely carried forward, continuing a cycle of division that now manifest itself into Lennon's resignation?
The community is eager for real change and effective leadership—not ongoing uncertainty and chaos. Historical breakthroughs, new leadership styles, and organizational shifts hold value only if they signify genuine transformation coupled with transparency and accountability. Without openness, unresolved tensions persist, potentially undermining the progress everyone seeks.
Kathy Lennon’s resignation should be a catalyst prompting deeper reflection. If genuine unity and meaningful change are the goals, the party must embrace transparency and openly address the circumstances surrounding her departure.
So, Kathy Lennon, we respectfully ask again: Why now? Our community deserves clarity.
Demetrus Coonrod
* * *
In these many years, I have noticed that when someone insists on answers or explanations "for the community," the community usually doesn't really care, just the person making the demand.
There are numerous reasons for a vacating a position or job; getting tired or frustrated with the job; family issues; financial issues; loss of interest; the feeling that someone else can do a better job; perhaps even a diagnosis that has come to fore. There are hundreds of other reasons, too numerous to list.
But all of these reasons have one thing in common: they aren't necessarily anyone else's business.
Ed Bradley