Big controversy this week when the city, tired of paying Democrats, opted to hire literal sheep to "clear land" for a "park." What? Naturally some people get angry that animals are useful sometimes, that the poor literally wool-covered beats are stuck out in weather that only Southerners could consider cold, and all that hullabaloo.
This seems tremendously inefficient and the sort of fluffy, luxurious indulgence that a tiny city in a billion dollars of debt should absolutely not be engaging in.
You know what doesn't have animal rights concerns? Forestry mulchers.
Radically more efficient and effective.
Why is the city completely allergic to good decisions?
Chris Wicker