State Supreme Court Holds That Amendments To Theft Grading Statute Are Applicable When Defendant Was Sentenced After Effective Date

Wednesday, November 27, 2019

The Tennessee Supreme Court has held that the 2016 amendments to the theft grading statute are applicable when sentencing a defendant even where the offense occurred before the effective date of the amendments if sentencing occurred after the effective date.

The Public Safety Act of 2016, which took effect on January 1, 2017, amended the statute providing for grading of theft offenses.  Specifically, section 5 of the Act removed and replaced the stolen property value ranges for Class A misdemeanor, Class E felony, and Class D felony theft.  For instance, under the pre-2017 version of the statute, theft of property valued at $1,000 or more but less than $10,000 constituted a Class D felony, but after January 1, 2017, theft of the same amount could potentially constitute one of three separate offense classes: theft of exactly $1,000 (Class A misdemeanor); theft of more than $1,000 but less than $2,500 (Class E felony); or theft of $2,500 or more but less than $10,000 (Class D felony).

While a criminal offender generally must be sentenced pursuant to the statute in effect at the time of the offense, the legislature has enacted a Criminal Savings Statute, Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-11-112, which requires courts to apply a subsequent statute to a defendant’s sentencing if the subsequent statute “provides for a lesser penalty.”  A split of authority emerged among separate panels of the Court of Criminal Appeals concerning whether the amendments to the theft grading statute “provide[ ] for a lesser penalty,” therefore requiring the application of the “subsequent act.”

To resolve the conflict in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decisions, the Tennessee Supreme Court granted permission to appeal in three cases, each of which involved a defendant who committed a theft offense prior to the effective date of the Public Safety Act but was sentenced in accordance with the amended theft grading statute.

The first defendant, Ashley N. Menke, pleaded guilty in 2016 for theft of property valued at $1,000 or more but less than $10,000, a Class D felony at the time of the offense.  However, she was sentenced after the amendments’ effective date pursuant to the amended statute.  The second defendant, Charles Keese, was convicted in 2015 of theft of property valued at $1,000 or more but less than $10,000.  Although his sentencing took place before the amendments’ effective date, he too was sentenced pursuant to the amended statute.  The third defendant, Michael Eugene Tolle, pleaded guilty in 2012 to theft of property valued at more than $500 but less than $1,000, a Class E felony at the time of the offense.  Following the revocation of his probation in 2017, the trial court modified the defendant’s offense class and sentenced him pursuant to the amended statute.  In each case, the State appealed the imposed sentence. 

In each of its opinions, the Supreme Court first determined that the State had the right to appeal the sentence.  Next, the Court held that the Criminal Savings Statute does apply to the amendments to the theft grading statute.  Noting that the value of the stolen property is not an essential element of the offense of theft, the Court determined that the amendments, at least in effect, decreased the punishment for the defendants’ crimes.  Therefore, the “lesser penalty” language of the Criminal Savings Statute was satisfied, and the amended version of the theft grading statute applies even when the offense occurred before the effective date.

As a result, the Supreme Court concluded that the defendant in State v. Menke was appropriately sentenced by the trial court in accordance with the amended theft grading statute.  However, the Court determined that the trial court in State v. Keese erred in sentencing the defendant under the amended version of the theft grading statute when the sentencing occurred prior to its effective date and that the trial court in State v. Tolle exceeded its authority in modifying the offense class and sentence pursuant to the amended version of the statute following the revocation of the defendant’s probation.

To read the unanimous opinions in State v. Ashley N. MenkeState v. Charles Keese, and State v. Michael Eugene Tolle, all authored by Justice Roger A. Page, visit the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.


Stay Cool, Save Money

IdentiFi Launches To Match Candidates To Companies, Companies To Candidates

Access Garage Doors Expands Into South Raleigh Market


Tmperatures are on the rise, but that doesn't mean your electric bill has to go up in lockstep. Get smart about your energy use to keep your AC running and your bill under control. Temperatures ... (click for more)

IdentiFi Careers has opened at 1200 Market St. offering one-on-one consulting that helps growing companies find qualified candidates. “Having been in recruiting for over 20 years, I know that ... (click for more)

Access Garage Doors has expanded its growing company footprint into the south Raleigh market. Headquartered in Chattanooga, Access Garage Doors is a top-ranking authorized dealer for Liftmaster ... (click for more)



Business

Stay Cool, Save Money

Tmperatures are on the rise, but that doesn't mean your electric bill has to go up in lockstep. Get smart about your energy use to keep your AC running and your bill under control. Temperatures are rising as a heat wave grips the Valley. To keep us all calm, cool and collected, TVA has readied its electric grid for the expected strain summer temperatures can put on the transmission ... (click for more)

IdentiFi Launches To Match Candidates To Companies, Companies To Candidates

IdentiFi Careers has opened at 1200 Market St. offering one-on-one consulting that helps growing companies find qualified candidates. “Having been in recruiting for over 20 years, I know that it takes building genuine relationships to help organizations and talent find what they’re looking for,” said Kathy Lane, president of IdentiFi. “We focus on consultation and guidance tailored ... (click for more)

Breaking News

IRONMAN Events In Chattanooga Canceled For 2020

Based on the recent mandate from the city of Chattanooga in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Little Debbie IRONMAN Chattanooga presented by McKee, A Family Bakery triathlon originally scheduled for Sept. 27 cannot take place in 2020 and will return on Sept. 26, 2021. Additionally, the Sunbelt Bakery IRONMAN 70.3 Chattanooga presented by McKee, A Family Bakery triathlon ... (click for more)

Mackey Pulls Resolution On Discretionary Spending For Now; Says Race Was Injected Into The Issue

County Commissioner Warren Mackey on Wednesday pulled a controversial resolution that would give each commissioner $100,000 per year for doling out to non-profit community groups. Commissioner Mackey said he believed that he had the necessary votes to pass it. However, he said "race has been injected in the issue." He said he was referring to a column in the Chattanooga ... (click for more)

Opinion

Bassam Issa: My Vision For The Northgate Property And The Schools

For the sake of clarity, transparency, and community, I want to address the redevelopment of portions of Northgate Mall that I am working on, which have been commented upon in news reports, editorial pages, and social media. Misunderstanding begets disappointment, and I want to make sure we are all on the same page. We stand on this beloved Chattanooga soil together, and when I ... (click for more)

Vote No To The Discretionary Funds Resolution

Once again, the subject of discretionary funds rears its ugly head as the county commissioners seek to buy votes and consolidate their power. And once again, it is time for the commissioners who care about sound fiscal policy to say “enough is enough.” It is time for this Commission to get it through their collective heads that these taxpayer dollars are not to be used for whatever ... (click for more)