Supreme Court Reviews Child Custody Case

And Appellate Court's Immediate Issuance Of Mandate

Tuesday, December 19, 2017

In a case involving the custody of two minor children, the Tennessee Supreme Court determined that father had established that a material change of circumstances had occurred and that it was in the children’s best interests for father to be designated as the primary residential parent.  The Court also reviewed the Court of Appeals’ immediate issuance of the mandate and its order for custody to be transferred from father to mother within 20 days.  

Father, C.W.H., and mother, L.A.S., began a dating relationship in 2008 but never married.  They had two children together before their relationship deteriorated in 2010.  In 2011, mother decided to relocate to Ohio to pursue an advanced degree; thus, the parties entered into an agreed parenting plan to accommodate the distance.  The parenting plan designated mother as primary residential parent and provided father with visitation.  

After having difficulties exercising his parenting time, father filed a petition in 2012 to modify the 2011 parenting plan.  The parties reached a new agreement in February 2013.  

Shortly thereafter, mother’s sister contacted father and informed him that mother actually resided in Nevada with the minor children and that she was employed at the Moonlight Bunny Ranch.  Father had believed that ,other resided in Ohio and worked as an independent contractor.  Father researched the internet and confirmed these assertions when he found sexually explicit photographs and videos of mother advertising her services in Nevada.  He filed a motion for an emergency temporary custody order and temporary restraining order on March 12, 2013.  The magistrate found that a material change in circumstances had occurred and that it was in the children’s best interests for father to be designated as the primary residential parent.  Mother requested a hearing before the juvenile court. 

In the juvenile court hearing, the court heard testimony concerning ,other’s employment at the Moonlight Bunny Ranch and testimony relative to the issue of each parent’s hostility toward the other.  The juvenile court relied upon mother’s employment as well as her hostility toward father in finding a material change in circumstances.  The juvenile court ordered that father be designated as the primary residential parent. 

Mother appealed the decision to the Court of Appeals.  The court remanded the case for the juvenile court to conduct a best interest analysis, which it had not done.  After conducting this analysis, the juvenile court concluded that it was in the children’s best interests for father to be the primary residential parent. 

Mother again appealed.  The Court of Appeals reversed the juvenile court’s finding of a material change in circumstances based upon mother’s employment at the Moonlight Bunny Ranch, but because mother had not preserved the finding of her hostility toward father as a material change, the Court of Appeals affirmed that finding.  The Court of Appeals reversed the juvenile court’s conclusion that the best interests of the children favored father as the primary residential parent.  In doing so, it ordered immediate issuance of the mandate and transfer of custody of the children from father to mother within 20 days.  

The Supreme Court reiterated its prior holdings that appellate courts should exercise limited review of a trial court’s factual determinations in matters involving child custody and parenting plan developments.  The Court concluded that the Court of Appeals usurped the role of the juvenile court by declining to extend deference to the juvenile court’s findings.  Applying the appropriate limited scope of review, the Supreme Court held that the juvenile court properly considered the appropriate statutory factors governing the best interest analysis and that the evidence did not preponderate against the juvenile court’s findings in this regard.  

The Supreme Court also expressed disagreement with the Court of Appeals’ issuing the mandate immediately, rather than allowing the 64 days to pass according to Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.  Although such issuance is expressly allowed by the rule, the Court cautioned against this exercise of authority in child custody cases absent a reasonable belief that a child would be in danger if the parent awarded custody by the trial court retained custody in the interim because such a chain of events would likely be harmful to the welfare of the child.  In this case, there were no allegations of either potential or immediate danger to the children if they had remained in father’s custody.  

To read the unanimous opinion in C.W.H. v. L.A.S. authored by Justice Roger A. Page, go to the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.



AG Slatery Urges Congress To Consider Pandemic Liability Protections

GDOL Addresses Outstanding Claims

Finalists For Chattanooga's 1st Annual Technology Excellence Awards Announced


Attorney General Herbert H. Slatery III, along with 21 other state attorneys general, co-signed a letter to Congress urging the adoption of the protections contained in the Safe to Work Act. ... (click for more)

The Georgia Department of Labor has recently been asked why not all initial unemployment insurance claims from the middle of March have not been paid. Officials said 92 percent of all valid claims ... (click for more)

ChaTech, the Chattanooga Technology Council, announces the first annual Technology Excellence Awards (TechX). The inaugural TechX Awards will recognize regional companies for outstanding involvement, ... (click for more)



Business

AG Slatery Urges Congress To Consider Pandemic Liability Protections

Attorney General Herbert H. Slatery III, along with 21 other state attorneys general, co-signed a letter to Congress urging the adoption of the protections contained in the Safe to Work Act. The legislation would help mitigate the threat of frivolous COVID-related litigation for much-needed goods and services while still ensuring victims have legal options where appropriate. The ... (click for more)

GDOL Addresses Outstanding Claims

The Georgia Department of Labor has recently been asked why not all initial unemployment insurance claims from the middle of March have not been paid. Officials said 92 percent of all valid claims have received benefits in the past 19 weeks where a payment has been requested, but many of the others are not eligible for payment per state and federal law. Over 135,000 claims have ... (click for more)

Breaking News

"Good Trouble Freedom Ride" Rally Moved To Community Haven Friday Night

The Community Haven was anything but serene during Friday’s rally against police brutality and systemic racism. Originally planned to take place in Miller Park, the event had to change venues after the city strongly advised the group of Chattanoogans and Atlantans to stay away off any city property. “We’re glad that we’re at the community haven and feel welcome here with brother ... (click for more)

Hamilton County Has 3 More COVID Deaths, State Has 20

The Hamilton County Health Department reported that the total number of Hamilton County resident deaths has risen to 53. Below are details of deaths 50-53: #50: 61-70 year old African-American, non-Hispanic male with multiple underlying conditions. #51: 61-70 year old African-American female with no underlying conditions and who was asymptomatic at the time of testing. ... (click for more)

Opinion

Congratulations To Marco Perez

Congratulations to Marco Perez on winning the District 2 School Board race. Marco and his team ran a well organized campaign. It is my hope that Marco will take that same organizational skill to continue the improvement of our public schools for the benefit of our nearly 45,000 students. Thanks to my incredible campaign team that worked tirelessly. Thanks as well to the many ... (click for more)

Roy Exum: The Saturday Funnies

These two hunters are out in the woods when one of them collapses. He doesn't seem to be breathing and his eyes are glazed. The other guy takes out his phone and calls the emergency services. He gasps: "My friend is dead! What can I do?" The operator says: "Calm down, I can help. First, let's make sure he's dead." In the silence that follows, allow me to welcome you to this ... (click for more)