Tennessee Supreme Court Rules Under Anti-Slapp Law Attorney's Fees Cannot Be Recovered If Plaintiff Drops The Case

  • Wednesday, October 9, 2024

The Tennessee Supreme Court today held that a party could not recover attorney’s fees under the Tennessee Public Participation Act (“TPPA”) after the original lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed.  The TPPA is Tennessee’s version of an anti-SLAPP statute.  SLAPP stands for “strategic lawsuit against public participation” and refers to a lawsuit that is brought primarily to chill the speech of individuals by subjecting them to costly litigation, without regard to prevailing on the merits.  A defendant in what is believed to be a SLAPP suit may file a petition under the TPPA, which provides a mechanism to achieve the swift dismissal of a non-meritorious lawsuit before litigation costs mount.  The TPPA also shifts the attorney’s fees incurred by the defendant to the party that brought the SLAPP suit.

In this case, Robert E. Lee Flade brought a lawsuit against several defendants based on what he considered to be disparaging remarks that were made on social media.  In response, two of the defendants filed petitions under the TPPA, arguing that Mr. Flade’s lawsuit was a SLAPP suit that should be dismissed.  Before the petitions were heard by the trial court, Mr. Flade voluntarily dismissed his lawsuit.  Nevertheless, the defendants sought to have the trial court rule on their petitions.  The trial court declined, finding that Mr. Flade’s voluntary dismissal concluded the matter.  The Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision.

In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision below.  The Court noted that the availability of a voluntary dismissal is a longstanding right under Tennessee law subject only to certain limited exceptions.  

The Court examined whether the filing of a TPPA petition fell within one of those exceptions, such that Mr. Flade could not unilaterally dismiss his lawsuit without having the TPPA petitions adjudicated.  The Court considered three arguments advanced by the defendants for an exception, but it held that none of them amounted to a valid exception to the voluntary dismissal rule.

To read the Supreme Court’s opinion in Flade v. City of Shelbyville, authored by Justice Jeff Bivins, visit the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.

Business
UT Center For Industrial Services Certifies New Economic Developers
UT Center For Industrial Services Certifies New Economic Developers
  • 4/17/2025

Planning Commissioner for the city of South Pittsburg & Industrial Development Board Member of Marion County Mike Garland was part of The University of Tennessee Center for Industrial Services’ ... more

Goodwill To Host Forklift Operator Training Course  April 28-May 1
Goodwill To Host Forklift Operator Training Course April 28-May 1
  • 4/16/2025

The Goodwill Industries of the Greater Chattanooga Area is hosting a forklift operator training course in conjunction with Sunbelt Rentals on Monday, April 28, through Thursday, May 1. The class ... more

La Paz Chattanooga Announces New Hire And Staff Promotions
La Paz Chattanooga Announces New Hire And Staff Promotions
  • 4/16/2025

La Paz Chattanooga announced three internal promotions, as well as the addition of one new hire to the organization’s full-time staff. Two of the three promotions elevated longtime team members ... more