Tennessee Supreme Court Rules Under Anti-Slapp Law Attorney's Fees Cannot Be Recovered If Plaintiff Drops The Case

  • Wednesday, October 9, 2024

The Tennessee Supreme Court today held that a party could not recover attorney’s fees under the Tennessee Public Participation Act (“TPPA”) after the original lawsuit was voluntarily dismissed.  The TPPA is Tennessee’s version of an anti-SLAPP statute.  SLAPP stands for “strategic lawsuit against public participation” and refers to a lawsuit that is brought primarily to chill the speech of individuals by subjecting them to costly litigation, without regard to prevailing on the merits.  A defendant in what is believed to be a SLAPP suit may file a petition under the TPPA, which provides a mechanism to achieve the swift dismissal of a non-meritorious lawsuit before litigation costs mount.  The TPPA also shifts the attorney’s fees incurred by the defendant to the party that brought the SLAPP suit.

In this case, Robert E. Lee Flade brought a lawsuit against several defendants based on what he considered to be disparaging remarks that were made on social media.  In response, two of the defendants filed petitions under the TPPA, arguing that Mr. Flade’s lawsuit was a SLAPP suit that should be dismissed.  Before the petitions were heard by the trial court, Mr. Flade voluntarily dismissed his lawsuit.  Nevertheless, the defendants sought to have the trial court rule on their petitions.  The trial court declined, finding that Mr. Flade’s voluntary dismissal concluded the matter.  The Court of Appeals upheld the trial court’s decision.

In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court affirmed the decision below.  The Court noted that the availability of a voluntary dismissal is a longstanding right under Tennessee law subject only to certain limited exceptions.  

The Court examined whether the filing of a TPPA petition fell within one of those exceptions, such that Mr. Flade could not unilaterally dismiss his lawsuit without having the TPPA petitions adjudicated.  The Court considered three arguments advanced by the defendants for an exception, but it held that none of them amounted to a valid exception to the voluntary dismissal rule.

To read the Supreme Court’s opinion in Flade v. City of Shelbyville, authored by Justice Jeff Bivins, visit the opinions section of TNCourts.gov.

Business
Chattanooga App Developer Meets With Lawmakers In D.C.
  • 5/6/2025

Julius Hubbard, co-founder and art director of Chattanooga-based Firesight Studios, met with officials from the office of Rep. Chuck Fleischmann to discuss issues facing U.S.-based app developers. ... more

TVA Invests $2.3 Million To Make 98 Schools Safer, More Energy Efficient
  • 5/6/2025

The Tennessee Valley Authority announced Tuesday that 98 schools across its Southeast region will reduce their power bills and have healthier air thanks to over $2.3 million in funding for energy ... more

JDH To Host Open House May 8
  • 5/6/2025

JDH invites friends, partners and East Ridge neighbors to their Open House this Thursday from 4:30-7 p.m. at their new facility at 5615 Oakdale Ave. "JDH Company is Chattanooga’s leading ... more